23 found
Michael D. Robinson [23]Michael Dale Robinson [1]
See also
Michael Robinson
University of Southern California
  1.  37
    Measures of emotion: A review.Iris B. Mauss & Michael D. Robinson - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (2):209-237.
  2.  14
    Running from William James' Bear: A Review of Preattentive Mechanisms and their Contributions to Emotional Experience. [REVIEW]Michael D. Robinson - 1998 - Cognition and Emotion 12 (5):667-696.
  3.  15
    Anger as “seeing red”: Evidence for a perceptual association.Adam K. Fetterman, Michael D. Robinson & Brian P. Meier - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (8):1445-1458.
  4.  9
    The Reactive and Prospective Functions of Mood: Its Role in Linking Daily Experiences and Cognitive Well-being.Michael D. Robinson - 2000 - Cognition and Emotion 14 (2):145-176.
  5. Putting process into personality, appraisal, and emotion: Evaluative processing as a missing link.Michael D. Robinson, P. Vargas & Emily G. Crawford - 2003 - In Jochen Musch & Karl C. Klauer (eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Lawerence Erlbaum. pp. 275--306.
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  14
    Cognitive sources of evidence for neuroticism's link to punishment-reactivity processes.Sara K. Moeller & Michael D. Robinson - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (5):741-759.
  7.  13
    Are self-deceivers enhancing positive affect or denying negative affect? Toward an understanding of implicit affective processes.Michael D. Robinson, Sara K. Moeller & Paul W. Goetz - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (1):152-180.
  8.  16
    Understanding Personality and Predicting Outcomes: The Utility of Cognitive-Behavioral Probes of Approach and Avoidance Motivation.Michael D. Robinson, Ryan L. Boyd & Tianwei Liu - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (3):303-307.
    Approach and avoidance motivation may represent important explanatory constructs in understanding how individuals differ. Such constructs have primarily been assessed in self-reported terms, but there are limitations to self-reports of motivation. Accordingly, the present review concentrates on the potential utility of implicit cognitive-behavioral probes of approach and avoidance motivation in modeling and understanding individual differences. The review summarizes multiple lines of research that have documented the utility of such probes to the personality-processing interface. Although multiple gaps in our knowledge exist, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Attention to emotion and reliance on feelings in decision-making: Variations on a pleasure principle.Michael D. Robinson, Robert J. Klein, Roberta L. Irvin & Avianna Z. McGregor - 2021 - Cognition 217 (C):104904.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  10. Mindfulness and Voluntary Work Behavior: Further Support for an Affect Mediation Model.Michael D. Robinson & Sukumarakurup Krishnakumar - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    Mindfulness, defined in terms of greater attention and awareness concerning present experience, seems to have a number of psychological benefits, but very little of this research has focused on possible benefits within the workplace. Even so, mindfulness appears to buffer against stress and negative affect, which often predispose employees to deviant behaviors. Conversely, mindful employees may be more engaged with their jobs, which could support organizational citizenship. Two studies pursued these ideas. In Study 1, part-time employees who were higher in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  11.  4
    The Storms of Providence: Navigating the Waters of Calvinism, Arminianism, and Open Theism.Michael D. Robinson - 2003 - Upa.
    The Storms of Providence surveys and critiques Calvinism, Arminianism, and Open Theism as models of the divine-world relationship. Further, the book defends a modified version of traditional Arminianism. The author contends that the most theologically and philosophically sound model of the divine-world relationship is one that affirms that human actions are free and not divinely determined, even while asserting that God has complete knowledge of the future.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  12.  20
    Hello darkness my old friend: preferences for darkness vary by neuroticism and co-occur with negative affect.Michelle R. Persich, Jessica L. Bair, Becker Steinemann, Stephanie Nelson, Adam K. Fetterman & Michael D. Robinson - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (5):885-900.
    ABSTRACTMetaphors frequently link negative affect with darkness and associations of this type have been established in several experimental paradigms. Given the ubiquity and strength of these associations, people who prefer dark to light may be more prone to negative emotional experiences and symptoms. A five study investigation couches these ideas in a new theoretical framework and then examines them. Across studies, 1 in 4 people preferred the perceptual concept of dark over the perceptual concept of light. These dark-preferring people scored (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
  13.  11
    Counting to ten milliseconds: Low-anger, but not high-anger, individuals pause following negative evaluations.Michael D. Robinson, Benjamin M. Wilkowski, Brian P. Meier, Sara K. Moeller & Adam K. Fetterman - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (2):261-281.
  14.  6
    Losing control, literally: Relations between anger control, trait anger, and motor control.Konrad Bresin & Michael D. Robinson - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (6):995-1012.
  15.  13
    The negative feedback dysregulation effect: losses of motor control in response to negative feedback.Robert J. Klein & Michael D. Robinson - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (3):536-547.
    ABSTRACTNegative feedback has paradoxical features to it. This form of feedback can have informational value under some circumstances, but it can also threaten the ego, potentially upsetting behaviour as a result. To investigate possible consequences of the latter type, two experiments presented positive or negative feedback within a sequence-prediction task that could not be solved. Following feedback, participants had to control their behaviours as effectively as possible in a motor control task. Relative to positive feedback, negative feedback undermined control in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
  16.  11
    Cognitive-emotional dysfunction among noisy minds: Predictions from individual differences in reaction time variability.Scott Ode, Michael D. Robinson & Devin M. Hanson - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (2):307-327.
  17.  12
    Living large: Affect amplification in visual perception predicts emotional reactivity to events in daily life.Spencer L. Palder, Scott Ode, Tianwei Liu & Michael D. Robinson - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (3):453-464.
  18.  12
    Routine cognitive errors: A trait-like predictor of individual differences in anxiety and distress.Adam K. Fetterman & Michael D. Robinson - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (2):244-264.
  19.  16
    Book reviews. [REVIEW]Michael D. Robinson, Diane Steinberg & Larry Lacy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):117-124.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  20.  4
    Does God Know Best?Michael D. Robinson - 2007 - Philosophia Christi 9 (2):383-406.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  21.  8
    Clear heads are cool heads: Emotional clarity and the down-regulation of antisocial affect.Benjamin M. Wilkowski & Michael D. Robinson - 2008 - Cognition and Emotion 22 (2):308-326.
  22.  14
    Seven sins in the study of unconscious affect.Gerald L. Clore, Justin Storbeck, Michael D. Robinson & David B. Centerbar - 2005 - In Lisa Feldman Barrett, Paula M. Niedenthal & Piotr Winkielman (eds.), Emotion and Consciousness. Guilford Press. pp. 384-408.
  23.  1
    Leveraging individual differences to understand grounded procedures.Adam K. Fetterman, Michael D. Robinson & Brian P. Meier - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44.
    We applaud the goals and execution of the target article, but note that individual differences do not receive much attention. This is a shortcoming because individual differences can play a vital role in theory testing. In our commentary, we describe programs of research of this type and also apply similar thinking to the mechanisms proposed in the target article.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation