24 found
Michael D. Robinson [24]Michael Dale Robinson [1]
See also
Michael Robinson
University of Southern California
  1.  26
    Measures of Emotion: A Review.Iris B. Mauss & Michael D. Robinson - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (2):209-237.
  2.  12
    Running From William James' Bear: A Review of Preattentive Mechanisms and Their Contributions to Emotional Experience. [REVIEW]Michael D. Robinson - 1998 - Cognition and Emotion 12 (5):667-696.
  3.  12
    Anger as “Seeing Red”: Evidence for a Perceptual Association.Adam K. Fetterman, Michael D. Robinson & Brian P. Meier - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (8):1445-1458.
  4.  76
    Divine Providence, Simple Foreknowledge, and the ‘Metaphysical Principle’.Michael D. Robinson - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (4):471-483.
    In this essay, I challenge David P. Hunt's defence of the utility of simple foreknowledge for divine providence against the ‘Metaphysical Principle’. This principle asserts that circular causal loops are impossible. Hunt agrees with this principle but maintains that so long as the deity does not use simple foreknowledge in such a way that causal loops unfold, the Metaphysical Principle in not violated. I argue that Hunt's position still allows for the possibility of such causal loops and this itself is (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  21
    Stuck in a Rut: Perseverative Response Tendencies and the Neuroticism-Distress Relationship.Michael D. Robinson, Benjamin M. Wilkowski, Ben S. Kirkeby & Brian P. Meier - 2006 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (1):78-91.
  6.  9
    The Reactive and Prospective Functions of Mood: Its Role in Linking Daily Experiences and Cognitive Well-Being.Michael D. Robinson - 2000 - Cognition and Emotion 14 (2):145-176.
  7.  13
    Cognitive Sources of Evidence for Neuroticism's Link to Punishment-Reactivity Processes.Sara K. Moeller & Michael D. Robinson - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (5):741-759.
  8.  10
    Are Self-Deceivers Enhancing Positive Affect or Denying Negative Affect? Toward an Understanding of Implicit Affective Processes.Michael D. Robinson, Sara K. Moeller & Paul W. Goetz - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (1):152-180.
  9. Putting Process Into Personality, Appraisal, and Emotion: Evaluative Processing as a Missing Link.Michael D. Robinson, P. Vargas & Emily G. Crawford - 2003 - In Jochen Musch & Karl C. Klauer (eds.), The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion. Lawerence Erlbaum. pp. 275--306.
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10.  15
    Understanding Personality and Predicting Outcomes: The Utility of Cognitive-Behavioral Probes of Approach and Avoidance Motivation.Michael D. Robinson, Ryan L. Boyd & Tianwei Liu - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (3):303-307.
    Approach and avoidance motivation may represent important explanatory constructs in understanding how individuals differ. Such constructs have primarily been assessed in self-reported terms, but there are limitations to self-reports of motivation. Accordingly, the present review concentrates on the potential utility of implicit cognitive-behavioral probes of approach and avoidance motivation in modeling and understanding individual differences. The review summarizes multiple lines of research that have documented the utility of such probes to the personality-processing interface. Although multiple gaps in our knowledge exist, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  5
    Losing Control, Literally: Relations Between Anger Control, Trait Anger, and Motor Control.Konrad Bresin & Michael D. Robinson - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (6):995-1012.
  12.  36
    Divine Guidance and an Accidentally Necessary Future: A Response to Hunt.Michael D. Robinson - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (4):493-498.
    In his reply to my original essay, David Hunt maintains that I do not discuss how his defence of providentially useful simple foreknowledge violates the Metaphysical Principle. Further, he claims that I try to force him into both affirming and denying the accidental necessity of future events and their role in explaining divine advice-giving. In this response, I attempt to articulate more fully why Hunt's defence of simple foreknowledge implies that dependency loops could unfold. Further, I argue that Hunt's scenario (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  7
    Counting to ten Milliseconds: Low-Anger, but Not High-Anger, Individuals Pause Following Negative Evaluations.Michael D. Robinson, Benjamin M. Wilkowski, Brian P. Meier, Sara K. Moeller & Adam K. Fetterman - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (2):261-281.
  14.  11
    Cognitive-Emotional Dysfunction Among Noisy Minds: Predictions From Individual Differences in Reaction Time Variability.Scott Ode, Michael D. Robinson & Devin M. Hanson - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (2):307-327.
  15.  19
    Hello Darkness My Old Friend: Preferences for Darkness Vary by Neuroticism and Co-Occur with Negative Affect.Michelle R. Persich, Jessica L. Bair, Becker Steinemann, Stephanie Nelson, Adam K. Fetterman & Michael D. Robinson - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (5):885-900.
    ABSTRACTMetaphors frequently link negative affect with darkness and associations of this type have been established in several experimental paradigms. Given the ubiquity and strength of these associations, people who prefer dark to light may be more prone to negative emotional experiences and symptoms. A five study investigation couches these ideas in a new theoretical framework and then examines them. Across studies, 1 in 4 people preferred the perceptual concept of dark over the perceptual concept of light. These dark-preferring people scored (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
  16.  7
    Clear Heads Are Cool Heads: Emotional Clarity and the Down-Regulation of Antisocial Affect.Benjamin M. Wilkowski & Michael D. Robinson - 2008 - Cognition and Emotion 22 (2):308-326.
  17.  12
    Seven Sins in the Study of Unconscious Affect.Gerald L. Clore, Justin Storbeck, Michael D. Robinson & David B. Centerbar - 2005 - In Lisa Feldman Barrett, Paula M. Niedenthal & Piotr Winkielman (eds.), Emotion and Consciousness. Guilford Press. pp. 384-408.
  18.  11
    The Negative Feedback Dysregulation Effect: Losses of Motor Control in Response to Negative Feedback.Robert J. Klein & Michael D. Robinson - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (3):536-547.
    ABSTRACTNegative feedback has paradoxical features to it. This form of feedback can have informational value under some circumstances, but it can also threaten the ego, potentially upsetting behaviour as a result. To investigate possible consequences of the latter type, two experiments presented positive or negative feedback within a sequence-prediction task that could not be solved. Following feedback, participants had to control their behaviours as effectively as possible in a motor control task. Relative to positive feedback, negative feedback undermined control in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
  19.  11
    Process Versus Content in Eyewitness Metamemory Monitoring.Michael D. Robinson, Joel T. Johnson & David A. Robertson - 2000 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6 (3):207-221.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
  20.  11
    Living Large: Affect Amplification in Visual Perception Predicts Emotional Reactivity to Events in Daily Life.Spencer L. Palder, Scott Ode, Tianwei Liu & Michael D. Robinson - 2013 - Cognition and Emotion 27 (3):453-464.
  21.  16
    Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Michael D. Robinson, Diane Steinberg & Larry Lacy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):117-124.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  22.  10
    Routine Cognitive Errors: A Trait-Like Predictor of Individual Differences in Anxiety and Distress.Adam K. Fetterman & Michael D. Robinson - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (2):244-264.
  23.  3
    Does God Know Best?Michael D. Robinson - 2007 - Philosophia Christi 9 (2):383-406.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  24. The Storms of Providence: Navigating the Waters of Calvinism, Arminianism, and Open Theism.Michael D. Robinson - 2003 - Upa.
    The Storms of Providence surveys and critiques Calvinism, Arminianism, and Open Theism as models of the divine-world relationship. Further, the book defends a modified version of traditional Arminianism. The author contends that the most theologically and philosophically sound model of the divine-world relationship is one that affirms that human actions are free and not divinely determined, even while asserting that God has complete knowledge of the future.
    Export citation