O. Linnebo [4]Oystein Linnebo [4]
  1.  4
    Which Abstraction Principles Are Acceptable? Some Limitative Results.O. Linnebo & G. Uzquiano - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):239-252.
  2. Stewart Shapiro. Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology.O. Linnebo - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):92-103.
  3. Science with Numbers: A Naturalistic Defense of Mathematical Platonism.Oystein Linnebo - 2002 - Dissertation, Harvard University
    My thesis discusses the unique challenge that platonistic mathematics poses to philosophical naturalism. It has two main parts. ;The first part discusses the three most important approaches to my problem found in the literature: First, W. V. Quine's holistic empiricist defense of mathematical platonism; then, the nominalists' argument that mathematical platonism is naturalistically unacceptable; and finally, a radical form of naturalism, due to John Burgess and Penelope Maddy, which dismisses any philosophical criticism of a successful science such as mathematics. I (...)
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Ontology and the Concept of an Object.Oystein Linnebo - manuscript
    When people deny that there are objects of a certain kind, they normally take this to be a reason to stop speaking as if such objects existed. For instance, when atheists deny the existence of God, they take this to be a reason to stop speaking about God’s will or His mercy. Or, to take a more mundane example, when people deny that there are round squares or that there are unicorns, they take this to be a reason to stop (...)
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5.  37
    Review: Fraser MacBride (Ed.): Identity and Modality. [REVIEW]O. Linnebo - 2008 - Mind 117 (467):705-708.
  6. To Be is to Be an F 1. Introduction.Oystein Linnebo - manuscript
    Is the natural number 3 identical with the Roman emperor Julius Caesar? In Grundlagen Frege raised some peculiar questions of this sort.1 There are two kinds of intuitions regarding such questions. On the one hand, these questions seem not only to be pointless but to be downright meaningless. Regardless of how much arithmetic one studies, no answer to the opening question will be forthcoming. Arithmetic tells us that 3 is the successor of 2 and that it is prime, but not (...)
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  7.  27
    Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein.O. Linnebo - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (1):98-101.
  8.  3
    Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein.Oystein Linnebo & William W. Tait - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (1):98.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography