6 found
Order:
  1.  5
    Physicians’ Quantitative Assessments of Medical Futility.William J. Winslade, Henry S. Perkins, Stuart J. Youngner, Jeffrey W. Swanson & S. Van McCrary - 1994 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 5 (2):100-105.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2.  4
    Physicians’ Legal Defensiveness in End-of-Life Treatment Decisions: Comparing Attitudes and Knowledge in States with Different Laws.Catherine Belling, Robert S. Olick, K. Faber-Langendoen, Jack Coulehan, Jeffrey W. Swanson & S. Van McCrary - 2006 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 17 (1):15-26.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  32
    The Best Lack All Conviction: Biomedical Ethics, Professionalism, and Social Responsibility.Jack Coulehan, Peter C. Williams, S. van Mccrary & Catherine Belling - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (1):21-38.
    Robert Coles' sentiment characterizes well the moral tenor of medical education today. Indeed, medical educators are frequently “seized by spasms of genuine moral awareness,” as they try to cope with the massive social and economic problems that face medical schools and teaching hospitals. The perception among educators that we currently fail to adequately teach several core aspects of doctoring, including professional values and behavior, constitutes one such spasm. In this case, the proposed remedy has generated considerable enthusiasm, but whether the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  8
    Doing All They Can: Physicians Who Deny Medical Futility.Jeffrey W. Swanson & S. Van McCrary - 1994 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (4):318-326.
    Why do some physicians continue to treat patients who are clearly dying or persistently unconscious, while others consider medical intervention to be futile past a certain point? No doubt, medical decisions vary in part because clinical information is often ambiguous in individual cases and because it may support more than one reasonable interpretation of a patient's chances for survival or improvement if a particular treatment is administered. Also, cases vary considerably to the extent that a patient's or a family member's (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  28
    Transferring Emerging Neuroscience to the Clinical Ethics Bedside.S. Van McCrary - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (9):21-23.
    In the target article, Grant Gillett (2009) has taken an important step toward greater synthesis of neuroethics, philosophy, and neuroscience. In his neo-Aristotelian account, Gillett posits a nece...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  6
    Therapeutic Privilege.S. Van McCrary - 2010 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (1):44-44.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark