Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):154-155 (2003)
|Abstract||One reason why humans don't behave according to standard game theoretical rationality is because it's not realistic to assume that everyone else is behaving rationally. An individual is expected to have psychological mechanisms that function to maximize his/her long-term payoffs in a world of potentially “irrational” individuals. Psychological decision theory has to be individualistic because individuals make decisions, not groups.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christoph Lumer (2010). Moral Desirability and Rational Decision. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):561-584.
Paul Weirich (1988). Hierarchical Maximization of Two Kinds of Expected Utility. Philosophy of Science 55 (4):560-582.
Patricia Greenspan (2009). Resting Content: Sensible Satisficing? American Philosophical Quarterly 46:305-17.
Hans Lottenbach (1994). Expected Utility and Constrained Maximization: Problems of Compatibility. Erkenntnis 41 (1):37 - 48.
Andrew M. Colman (2003). Cooperation, Psychological Game Theory, and Limitations of Rationality in Social Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):139-153.
Duncan MacIntosh (1989). Two Gauthiers? Dialogue 28 (01):43-.
Duncan MacIntosh (1991). Preference's Progress: Rational Self-Alteration and the Rationality of Morality. Dialogue 30 (1991):3-32.
Barry Schwartz, Yakov Ben-Haim & Cliff Dacso (2011). What Makes a Good Decision? Robust Satisficing as a Normative Standard of Rational Decision Making. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (2):209-227.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #178,844 of 550,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?