Delineating The Moral Domain in Moral Psychology

Problemos 86:90-101 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review current debate about the moral domain in the moral psychological literature. There is some vagueness in respect to the usage of the very concept of ‘morality’. This conceptual problem recently has been re-addressed by several authors. So far, there is little agreement, nobody seems to agree about how to delineate the moral domain from other ‘non-moral’ normative domains. Currently, there are several positions that disagree about the scope of morality, ranging from complete monists to complete pluralists. The paper will review these positions and will tentatively suggest further directions to test their claims. At this moment, there is no decisive evidence for either position.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Supererogation Across Normative Domains.Brian McElwee - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (3):505-516.
Invisible fences of the moral domain.Jonathan Haidt - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):552-553.
Kantian Constructivism and the Moral Problem.Bagnoli Carla - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (4):1229-1246.
An epistemic value theory.Dennis Whitcomb - 2007 - Dissertation, Rutgers
Measuring Moral Development.Michael Klenk - 2017 - de Filosoof 75:21-23.
Improving moral judgments: Philosophical considerations.Annemarie Kalis - 2010 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 30 (2):94-108.
What is Moral Reasoning?Leland F. Saunders - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology (1):1-20.
Are We Ready for An Ecological Morality?Ernest Partridge - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):175-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-31

Downloads
372 (#52,269)

6 months
87 (#50,380)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?