David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Theory and Practice 31 (4):483-498 (2005)
Communitarians have argued against Millian individualism (ethical liberalism) by claiming that it leads to the compartmentalization of life, and thus inhibits virtue, that it causes alienation, and leads to what I call the problem of choice. Ethical liberals celebrate the free choice of a conception of the good life, but communitarians respond by posing a dilemma. Either the choice is made in reference to some given standard (a social or natural telos), in which case it is not free, or it is made without reference to a standard, in which case it is arbitrary. This entails either ethical liberalism is false or it reduces to existentialism. I tackle each of these arguments in turn, showing that alienation is not any more of problem in liberal than in communitarian societies, and explain how virtues can fit between compartments in our lives. Regarding the problem of choice, I show that communitarians have assumed that justification must have a foundationalist structure. I show instead how a coherentist structure can allow for a person to begin with unchosen ends or with unchosen standards, but eventually arrive at a structure of ends (which constitute a vision of the good life) that is both freely chosen and rationally justified. This vindicates Millian individualism.
|Keywords||J.S. Mill alienation communitarianism ethical liberalism compartmentalization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
James Harold (2011). Is Xunzi's Virtue Ethics Susceptible to the Problem of Alienation? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):71-84.
Mikkel Gerken (2007). A False Dilemma for Anti-Individualism. American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (4):329-42.
Peter Lindsay (2002). The 'Disembodied Self' in Political Theory: The Communitarians, Macpherson and Marx. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2):191-211.
Charles Taylor (1994). Can Liberalism Be Communitarian? Critical Review 8 (2):257-262.
Peter A. French (2001). The Meaning of Democracy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:105-116.
Kenneth A. Strike (2000). Liberalism, Communitarianism and the Space Between: In Praise of Kindness. Journal of Moral Education 29 (2):133-147.
Andrew Jason Cohen (2000). On Universalism: Communitarians, Rorty, and (“Objectivist”) “Liberal Metaphysicians”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):39-75.
Jonathan Riley (2006). Liberal Rights in a Pareto-Optimal Code. Utilitas 18 (1):61-79.
Andrew J. Cohen (2000). Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Asocialism. Journal of Value Inquiry 34 (2/3):249-261.
Added to index2009-05-28
Total downloads61 ( #27,298 of 1,101,728 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #41,560 of 1,101,728 )
How can I increase my downloads?