David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 40 (1):42-64 (2009)
Abstract: In this essay a set of principles is defended that yields a determinate allocation of sovereign competences across a global system of territorially nested jurisdictions. All local sovereign competences are constrained by a universal, justiciable human rights regime that also incorporates a conception of cross-border distributive justice and regulates the competence to control immigration for a given territory. Subject to human rights constraints, sovereign competences are allocated according to a conception of global democracy. The proposed allocation scheme can accommodate substantial local autonomy while at the same time ensuring that everyone has a voice in the political decisions that affect his or her interests. The relevant class of affected interests is fully specified. Relevant affects are of two kinds: those that impose norms of governance on individuals, and those that impose external costs on them. The favored sense of "an external cost" is developed and defended.
|Keywords||nationalism external costs federalism international law globalization sovereignty immigration democracy all‐affected principle externalities democratic deficit human rights confederalism affected interests global governance equal protection borders territoriality global justice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Eric Cavallero (2006). An Immigration-Pressure Model of Global Distributive Justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (1):97-127.
Andreas Follesdal (1998). Survey Article: Subsidiarity. Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2):190-218.
Andreas Føllesdal (1998). Survey Article: Subsidiarity. Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2):190–218.
Robert E. Goodin (2007). Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and its Alternatives. Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1):40–68.
Carol C. Gould (2006). Self-Determination Beyond Sovereignty: Relating Transnational Democracy to Local Autonomy. Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (1):44–60.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeanne M. Logsdon & Donna J. Wood (2002). Business Citizenship: From Domestic to Global Level of Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):155-188.
James W. Nickel (2002). Is Today's International Human Rights System a Global Governance Regime? Journal of Ethics 6 (4):353-371.
Helder Schutter Ronald Tinneveldet (2009). Introduction: Global Democracy and Exclusion. Metaphilosophy 40 (1):1-7.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2009). Global Health Justice. Public Health Ethics 2 (3):261-275.
Kate Macdonald & Terry Macdonald (2010). Democracy in a Pluralist Global Order: Corporate Power and Stakeholder Representation. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):19-43.
Katrin Flikschuh (2011). On the Cogency of Human Rights. Jurisprudence 2 (1):17-36.
Carol C. Gould (2009). Structuring Global Democracy: Political Communities, Universal Human Rights, and Transnational Representation. Metaphilosophy 40 (1):24-41.
Omar Dahbour (2006). Is “Globalizing Democracy” Possible? Radical Philosophy Today 2006:255-260.
Michael Goodhart (2008). Human Rights and Global Democracy. Ethics and International Affairs 22 (4):395-420.
Added to index2009-02-19
Total downloads36 ( #50,960 of 1,100,145 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,012 of 1,100,145 )
How can I increase my downloads?