David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Kant-Gesellschaft E. V. Walter de Gruyter (ed.), Law and Peace in Kant’s Philosophy / Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Walter de Gruyter 1--139 (2008)
In Kant’s logical texts the reference of the form S is P to an “unknown = x” is well known, but its understanding still remains controversial. Due to the universality of all concepts, the subject as much as the predicate is regarded as predicate of the x, which, in turn, is regarded as the subject of the judgment. In the CPR, this Kantian interpretation of the S-P relationship leads to the question about the relations between intuition and concept in judgment. In contrast to intuition, if no concept, due to its universality, refers immediately to an object, how should one understand the relations of S and P to one another, as well as their relations to intuition, which corresponds to the possible individuality of the object in general = x? To answer this question, it is necessary to understand Kant’s notion of extension, and to prove its irreducibility to the Port-Royal notion of extension as well as to the Fregean one.
|Keywords||Kant judgment Port-Royal Logic Fregean Logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Günter Zöller (2008). Kant and the Problem of Existential Judgment: Critical Comments on Wayne Martin's Theories of Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):121 - 134.
Timothy Rosenkoetter (2010). Absolute Positing, the Frege Anticipation Thesis, and Kant's Definitions of Judgment. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):539-566.
Rodolphe Gasché (2003). The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant's Aesthetics. Stanford University Press.
Maria van Der Schaar (2008). Locke and Arnauld on Judgment and Proposition. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):327-341.
Béatrice Longuenesse (2003). Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste". Inquiry 46 (2):143 – 163.
R. Lanier Anderson (2008). Review: Martin, Wayne, Theories of Judgment. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):91-108.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro (1997). The Port-Royal Logic's Theory of Argument. Argumentation 11 (4):393-410.
Tim Henning (2010). Kant und die Logik des "Ich denke". Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 64 (3):331-356.
J. Steigerwald (2003). The Dynamics of Reason and its Elusive Object in Kant, Fichte and Schelling. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):111-134.
Jessica Leech (2012). Kant's Modalities of Judgment. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):260-284.
Wayne M. Martin (2006). Theories of Judgment: Psychology, Logic, Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press.
Hector Ferreiro (2012). El argumento ontológico y la muerte de la metafísica. Dos visiones complementarias: Kant y Hegel. Veritas: Revista de Filosofia da PUCRS 57 (3):99-120.
Hannah Ginsborg (2006). Thinking the Particular as Contained Under the Universal. In Rebecca Kukla (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant's Critical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
Added to index2011-09-12
Total downloads131 ( #29,909 of 1,911,817 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #50,323 of 1,911,817 )
How can I increase my downloads?