David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 19 (3):247 - 266 (1996)
In his writings Alfred Schutz identifies an artificiality in the concept of life-world produced by Edmund Husserl's method of reduction. As an alternative, he proposes to assume intersubjectivity as a given of everyday life. This eradicates Husserl's distinction between life-world and natural attitude. The subsequent phenomenological project appears to center upon sociological descriptions of the structures of the life-world rather than on a search for apodictic truth. Schutz, however, actually retains Husserl's emphasis on the subject. A tension then arises between the assumption of intersubjectivity and individual experience. Rather than clarifying the concept of intersubjectivity, this further problematizes it. Drawing upon Max Weber's work, Schutz responds by developing a rigorous methodology for studying the social world. But having rejected Husserl's reduction and conflated life-world and natural attitude, Schutz's analysis moves at the level of daily life itself. Consequently, the explanatory categories he proposes appear as abstractions rather than as a way of describing lived experience. Schutz, it is concluded, initiates a scientistic sociology in which the commonsense structures of the natural attitude of everyday life are subverted and replaced by the more rigorous knowledge of the scientific attitude. Schutz's version of phenomenology is ultimately untrue to the spirit of Husserl's original project; and deploying his work as a clear-cut alternative to scientistic tendencies within sociology is not as straightforward as it might at first seem.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kwang-ki Kim & Tim Berard (2009). Typification in Society and Social Science: The Continuing Relevance of Schutz's Social Phenomenology. [REVIEW] Human Studies 32 (3):263 - 289.
Lucia Ruggerone (2013). Science and Life-World: Husserl, Schutz, Garfinkel. [REVIEW] Human Studies 36 (2):179-197.
Similar books and articles
Maurice Natanson (1998). Alfred Schutz: Philosopher and Social Scientist. [REVIEW] Human Studies 21 (1):1-12.
Alfred Schutz & Maurice Alexander Natanson (eds.) (1970). Phenomenology and Social Reality. The Hague,Nijhoff.
Michael Barber (2006). Philosophy and Reflection: A Critique of Frank Welz's Sociological and “Processual” Criticism of Husserl and Schutz. [REVIEW] Human Studies 29 (2):141 - 157.
Jochen Dreher (2003). The Symbol and the Theory of the Life-World: “The Transcendences of the Life-World and Their Overcoming by Signs and Symbols”. Human Studies 26 (2):141-163.
Thomas Eberle (2010). The Phenomenological Life-World Analysis and the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Human Studies 33 (2):123-139.
Maurice Natanson (1966). The Phenomenology of Alfred Schutz. Inquiry 9 (1-4):147 – 155.
Alfred Schutz (1973). The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
Lester Embree, Alfred Schutz. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Nam-In Lee (2009). Husserl의 현상학과 Schutz의 현상학적 사회학(Husserl's Phenomenology and Schutz's Phenomenological Sociology). Schutzian Research 1:129-147.
Peter J. Carrington (1979). Schutz on Transcendental Intersubjectivity in Husserl. Human Studies 2 (1):95 - 110.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads54 ( #30,048 of 1,102,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #46,777 of 1,102,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?