David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138 (2006)
The Helsinki Declaration is a very important document regarding the protection of patients’ rights in clinical trials and one of the fundamental sources of operational principles for every ethics committee. Although they have been updated, the international guidelines for ethics committees continually fail to address certain issues pertaining to the protection of patients’ rights in clinical trials. These issues include, most significantly, the method of electing ethics committees (a free, secret ballot should be preferred to direct appointment), the avoidance of conflict of interest during the election of ethics committee members, and the necessary insurance coverage for the participants of clinical trials. Polish law should, on the other hand, be developed in such way as to not limit the effectiveness of ethics committees in protecting patients’ rights in clinical trials. The ideal solution would be to draft a uniform law concerning not only clinical trials, but all medical experiments. The opinions of experts who have been reviewing medical research projects for several years may prove to be especially valuable in this setting.
|Keywords||protection of patients’ rights clinical trials ethic committees|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Katherine McComas (2012). Researcher Views About Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest in Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):699-717.
Similar books and articles
Randolph Smoak (2004). Placebo: Its Action and Place in Health Research Today. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):9-13.
Boleslav Lichterman (2002). Conflict or Harmony? Clinical Research and the Medical Press in Russia. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):383-386.
David Shaw & Alex McMahon (2013). Ethicovigilance in Clinical Trials. Bioethics 27 (9):508-513.
Myriam Skrutkowska & Charles Weijer, Do Patients with Breast Cancer Participating in Clinical Trials Receive Better Nursing Care?
Margaret B. Liu (2010). A Clinical Trials Manual From the Duke Clinical Research Institute: Lessons From a Horse Named Jim. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sven Ove Hansson (2006). Uncertainty and the Ethics of Clinical Trials. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (2):149-167.
Maurie Markman (2004). The Research Misconception. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):241-252.
Joan Box (2004). Placebos and the UK Medical Research Council — and the Consumer Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):95-101.
Charles Weijer, Benjamin Freedman, Abraham Fuks, James Robbins, Stanley Shapiro & Myriam Skrutkowska, What Difference Does It Make to Be Treated in a Clinical Trial? A Pilot Study.
Danielle Laudy (2009). End of Life Pediatric Research: What About the Ethics? [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):87-91.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #114,782 of 1,692,743 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,244 of 1,692,743 )
How can I increase my downloads?