7 found
Sort by:
  1. John R. Williams, Dominique Sprumont, Marie Hirtle, Clement Adebamowo, Paul Braunschweiger, Susan Bull, Christian Burri, Marek Czarkowski, Chien Te Fan, Caroline Franck, Eugenjius Gefenas, Antoine Geissbuhler, Ingrid Klingmann, Bocar Kouyaté, Jean-Pierre Kraehenbhul, Mariana Kruger, Keymanthri Moodley, Francine Ntoumi, Thomas Nyirenda, Alexander Pym, Henry Silverman & Sara Tenorio (forthcoming). Consensus Standards for Introductory E-Learning Courses in Human Participants Research Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics:2013-101572.
    This paper reports the results of a workshop held in January 2013 to begin the process of establishing standards for e-learning programmes in the ethics of research involving human participants that could serve as the basis of their evaluation by individuals and groups who want to use, recommend or accredit such programmes. The standards that were drafted at the workshop cover the following topics: designer/provider qualifications, learning goals, learning objectives, content, methods, assessment of participants and assessment of the course. The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John R. Williams, Dominique Sprumont, Marie Hirtle, Clement Adebamowo, Paul Braunschweiger, Susan Bull, Christian Burri, Marek Czarkowski, Chien Te Fan & Caroline Franck (forthcoming). Consensus Standards for Introductory E-Learning Courses in Human Participants Research Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Marek Czarkowski (2010). The Dilemma of Dual Use Biological Research: Polish Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):99-110.
    Biological research with legitimate scientific purpose that may be misused to pose a biological threat to public health and/or national security is termed dual use. In Poland there are adequate conditions for conducting experiments that could be qualified as dual use research, and therefore, a risk of attack on Poland or other countries exists. Optimal solutions for limiting such threats are required, and the national system of biosecurity should enable early, reliable, and complete identification of this type of research. Scientists (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Marek Czarkowski (2009). Wykorzystywanie wyników badań naukowych w celach sprzecznych z ich założeniami. Diametros 19:26-34.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Marek Czarkowski & Krzysztof Różanowski (2009). Polish Research Ethics Committees in the European Union System of Assessing Medical Experiments. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2):201-212.
    The Polish equivalents of Research Ethics Committees are Bioethics Committees (BCs). A questionnaire study has been undertaken to determine their situation. The BC is usually comprised of 13 members. Nine of these are doctors and four are non-doctors. In 2006 BCs assessed an average of 27.3 ± 31.7 (range: 0–131) projects of clinical trials and 71.1 ± 139.8 (range: 0–638) projects of other types of medical research. During one BC meeting an average of 10.3 ± 14.7 (range: 0–71) projects of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Joanna Różyńska & Marek Czarkowski (2007). Emergency Research Without Consent Under Polish Law. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):337-350.
    Although Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use does not contain an exception for emergency situations, and requires the informed consent of a legal representative in all cases where research is conducted on legally competent individuals who are unable to give (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Marek Czarkowski (2006). The Protection of Patients' Rights in Clinical Trials. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
    The Helsinki Declaration is a very important document regarding the protection of patients’ rights in clinical trials and one of the fundamental sources of operational principles for every ethics committee. Although they have been updated, the international guidelines for ethics committees continually fail to address certain issues pertaining to the protection of patients’ rights in clinical trials. These issues include, most significantly, the method of electing ethics committees (a free, secret ballot should be preferred to direct appointment), the avoidance of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation