Gradable adjectives: A defence of pluralism

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):141-160 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper attacks the Implicit Reference Class Theory of gradable adjectives and proposes instead a ?pluralist? approach to the semantics of those terms, according to which they can be governed by a variety of different types of standards, one, but only one, of which is the group-indexed standards utilized by the Implicit Reference Class Theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
285 (#71,265)

6 months
12 (#213,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith DeRose
Yale University

Citations of this work

Epistemic Contextualism: An Idle Hypothesis.John Turri - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1):141-156.
Elusive Counterfactuals.Karen S. Lewis - 2016 - Noûs 50 (2):286-313.
Vagueness as Indecision.John MacFarlane - 2016 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 90 (1):255-283.
Indexical Predicates.Daniel Rothschild & Gabriel Segal - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (4):467-493.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge and Lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):353-356.
Vagueness, truth and logic.Kit Fine - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):265-300.
Context and logical form.Jason Stanley - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (4):391--434.
Context and Logical Form.Jason Stanley - 2013 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 316.

View all 18 references / Add more references