Radical Natural Law

Ethics and the Environment 28 (2):25-42 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:Natural law theory has a long history, going back to the Stoics. Ernst Bloch, a twentieth-century Marxist theorist, offered a compelling radical reconstruction of natural law, locating its source in the resistance of those whose natural law entitlements are being denied. That resistance, Bloch held, constitutes a critical standpoint, which forms the basis for radical natural law. Bloch restricted the concept to humans, but it is here proposed that animals too have critical standpoints which constitute the basis for radical natural law.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ernst Bloch on Natural Law and Human Nature.Serkan Golbasi - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 54:37-41.
Natural Theology: A Recent History.Olli-Pekka Vainio - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):1-18.
Natural right and history.Leo Strauss - 1953 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
Natural Law Theory.Brian Bix - 2010 - In Dennis Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 209–227.
Radical connectionism: Thinking with (not in) language.Gerard O'Brien & Jonathan Opie - 2002 - Language and Communication 22 (3):313-329.
Catharine Macaulay and the concept of “radical enlightenment”.Karen Green - 2021 - Intellectual History Review 31 (1):165-180.
Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant.Howard Williams - 2012 - Hobbes Studies 25 (1):66-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-05

Downloads
7 (#1,379,768)

6 months
7 (#419,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references