David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2003)
Human beings are both supremely rational and deeply superstitious, capable of believing just about anything and of questioning just about everything. Indeed, just as our reason demands that we know the truth, our skepticism leads to doubts we can ever really do so. In Walking the Tightrope of Reason, Robert J. Fogelin guides readers through a contradiction that lies at the very heart of philosophical inquiry. Fogelin argues that our rational faculties insist on a purely rational account of the universe, yet at the same time, the inherent limitations of these faculties ensure that we will never fully satisfy that demand. As a result of being driven to this point of paradox, we either comfort ourselves with what Kant called "metaphysical illusions" or adopt a stance of radical skepticism. No middle ground seems possible and, as Fogelin shows, skepticism, even though a healthy dose of it is essential for living a rational life, "has an inherent tendency to become unlimited in its scope, with the result that the edifice of rationality is destroyed." In much Postmodernist thought, for example, skepticism takes the extreme form of absolute relativism, denying the basis for any value distinctions and treating all truth-claims as equally groundless. How reason avoids disgracing itself, walking a fine line between dogmatic belief and self-defeating doubt, is the question Fogelin seeks to answer. Reflecting upon the ancient Greek skeptics as well as such thinkers as Hume, Kant, Wittgenstein, Nietzsche, and Whitman, this book takes readers into--and through--some of philosophy's most troubling paradoxes.
|Keywords||Reason Skepticism Metaphysics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$5.62 new (75% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BC177.F64 2003|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Williams (2004). Knowledge, Reflection and Sceptical Hypotheses. Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):315 - 343.
Amalia Amaya (2011). Legal Justification by Optimal Coherence. Ratio Juris 24 (3):304-329.
Similar books and articles
John P. Wright (2009). Hume's 'A Treatise of Human Nature': An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Kurtz (2010). Exuberant Skepticism. Prometheus Books 59 John Glenn Drive.
Ira Singer (2005). Walking the Tightrope of Reason. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 31 (1):169-172.
Robert J. Fogelin (2009). Hume's Skeptical Crisis: A Textual Study. Oxford University Press.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) (2004). Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press.
Casey Perin (2010). The Demands of Reason: An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. Oxford University Press.
Christine M. Korsgaard (1986). Skepticism About Practical Reason. Journal of Philosophy 83 (1):5-25.
Thomas Kelly (2004). Review: Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal. [REVIEW] Mind 113 (452):750-753.
Diego E. Machuca (2006). Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal. Dialogue 45 (1):188-191.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #78,735 of 1,100,083 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #66,994 of 1,100,083 )
How can I increase my downloads?