David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):253-277 (2004)
A framing effect occurs when an agent's choices are not invariant under changes in the way a decision problem is presented, e.g. changes in the way options are described (violation of description invariance) or preferences are elicited (violation of procedure invariance). Here we identify those rationality violations that underlie framing effects. We attribute to the agent a sequential decision process in which a “target” proposition and several “background” propositions are considered. We suggest that the agent exhibits a framing effect if and only if two conditions are met. First, different presentations of the decision problem lead the agent to consider the propositions in a different order (the empirical condition). Second, different such “decision paths” lead to different decisions on the target proposition (the logical condition). The second condition holds when the agent's initial dispositions on the propositions are “implicitly inconsistent,” which may be caused by violations of “deductive closure.” Our account is consistent with some observations made by psychologists and provides a unified framework for explaining violations of description and procedure invariance.
|Keywords||Framing Kahneman and Tversky Decision making Rationality Path-dependent reasoning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Raphaël Giraud (2009). Framing Effects as Violations of Extensionality. Theory and Decision 67 (4):385-404.
Michiru Nagatsu (2013). The Limits of Unification for Theory Appraisal: A Case of Economics and Psychology. Synthese 190 (2):2267-2289.
Silvia Lerner (2014). A Non-Monotonic Intensional Framework for Framing Effects. Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (1):37-53.
Similar books and articles
Fabrizio Cariani, Marc Pauly & Josh Snyder (2008). Decision Framing in Judgment Aggregation. Synthese 163 (1):1 - 24.
Richard Bradley & Christian List (2009). Desire-as-Belief Revisited. Analysis 69 (1):31-37.
Connie Rae Bateman, John Paul Fraedrich & Rajesh Iyer (2002). Framing Effects Within the Ethical Decision Making Process of Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1-2):119 - 140.
Doron Sonsino (2011). A Note on Negativity Bias and Framing Response Asymmetry. Theory and Decision 71 (2):235-250.
Alex Mintz & Steven B. Redd (2003). Framing Effects in International Relations. Synthese 135 (2):193 - 213.
Paul Weirich (2010). Utility and Framing. Synthese 176 (1):83 - 103.
Jason Hanna (2011). Consent and the Problem of Framing Effects. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):517-531.
Martin Peterson (2004). Transformative Decision Rules, Permutability, and Non-Sequential Framing of Decision Problems. Synthese 139 (3):387-403.
John Maule & Gaëlle Villejoubert (2007). What Lies Beneath: Reframing Framing Effects. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):25 – 44.
Christian List (2004). A Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions Over Multiple Propositions. American Political Science Review 98 (3):495-513.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads76 ( #59,176 of 1,934,793 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #66,510 of 1,934,793 )
How can I increase my downloads?