Mind 85 (337):112-119 (1976)
|Abstract||It is often taken for granted by writers who propose--and, for that matter, by writers who oppose--'justifications' of inductions, that deduction either does not need, or can readily be provided with, justification. The purpose of this paper is to argue that, contrary to this common opinion, problems analogous to those which, notoriously, arise in the attempt to justify induction, also arise in the attempt to justify deduction.|
|Keywords||Logic Deduction justification|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Janusz Czelakowski (1985). Algebraic Aspects of Deduction Theorems. Studia Logica 44 (4):369 - 387.
Kyburg (1958). The Justification of Deduction. The Review of Metaphysics 12 (1):19-25.
Michael Barker (2001). The Proof Structure of Kant's a-Deduction. Kant-Studien 92 (3):259-282.
Philip Dwyer (2010). Necessity and Possibility: The Logical Strategy of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):402-403.
Michael A. E. Dummett (1974). The Justification of Deduction. Oxford University Press.
Yannis Delmas-Rigoutsos (1997). A Double Deduction System for Quantum Logic Based on Natural Deduction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):57-67.
Francis Jeffry Pelletier (1999). A Brief History of Natural Deduction. History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (1):1-31.
Susan Haack (1982). Dummett's Justification of Deduction. Mind 91 (362):216-239.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads156 ( #2,325 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #5,011 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?