David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Axiomathes 21 (4):507-529 (2011)
This paper asks whether persistence can be a matter of convention. It argues that in a rather unexciting de dicto sense persistence is indeed a matter of convention, but it rejects the notion that persistence can be a matter of convention in a more substantial de re sense. However, scenarios can be imagined that appear to involve conventional persistence of the latter kind. Since there are strong reasons for thinking that such conventionality is impossible, it is desirable that our metaphysical-cum-semantic theories of persistence be able to account for such scenarios in terms of conventions of the first kind. Later parts of the article therefore investigate whether three of the currently most influential metaphysical-cum-semantic theories of persistence—the endurance theory, the stage theory, and the perdurance theory—can do this. Fortunately, for them, it turns out that all can, though some philosophers have disputed this. However, when we ask how they account for a typical case of “conventional persistence” some problematic features of the theories—having to do with reference, persistence conditions, how they relate, and the epistemology of persistence—are revealed
|Keywords||Persistence Endurance Perdurance Exdurance Stage theory Identity through time Conventionalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
W. V. Quine (1960). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
Willard Van Orman Quine, Patricia Smith Churchland & Dagfinn Føllesdal (2013). Word and Object. The MIT Press.
Theodore Sider (2001). Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford University Press.
Saul A. Kripke (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press.
Robert Nozick (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2014). The Endurance/Perdurance Controversy is No Storm in a Teacup. Axiomathes 24 (4):463-482.
Similar books and articles
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2009). Objects in Time: Studies of Persistence in B-Time. Dissertation, Lund University
Brian J. Scholl (2007). Object Persistence in Philosophy and Psychology. Mind and Language 22 (5):563–591.
Wim Ruitenburg (1999). Basic Logic, K4, and Persistence. Studia Logica 63 (3):343-352.
Nicholas Asher (1994). Problems with Persistence. Topoi 13 (1):37-49.
István Aranyosi (2009). Hesperus is Phosphorus, Indeed. Axiomathes 19 (2):223-224.
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2008). Can I Be an Instantaneous Stage and yet Persist Through Time? Metaphysica 9 (2):235-239.
Dilip Ninan (2009). Persistence and the First-Person Perspective. Philosophical Review 118 (4):425--464.
Johanna Seibt (2008). Beyond Endurance and Perdurance: Recurrent Dynamics. In Christian Kanzian (ed.), Persistence. Ontos
Kristie Lyn Miller (2006). Issues in Theoretical Diversity: Persistence, Composition, and Time. Springer.
Douglas Ehring (1997). Causation and Persistence: A Theory of Causation. Oxford University Press.
Bradley Strawser (2011). Rea's Revenge and the Persistent Problem of Persistence for Realism. Philosophia 39 (2):375-391.
Michael Bruno & Shaun Nichols (2010). Intuitions About Personal Identity: An Empirical Study. Philosophical Psychology 23 (3):293-312.
Yuri Balashov (2000). Persistence and Space-Time. The Monist 83 (3):321-340.
Added to index2010-07-03
Total downloads89 ( #46,970 of 1,906,972 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #42,893 of 1,906,972 )
How can I increase my downloads?