Crisp's ‘ethics without reasons?’: A note on invariance
Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):50-54 (2007)
| Abstract | Crisp is right to detect a clash between Dancy's leading formulation of holism about reasons and the phenomenon of invariance. Replying to Crisp on behalf of the particularist, I suggest a better formulation of holism modelled on a standard treatment in the philosophy of language of context-sensitive expressions. Key Words: context-sensitivity • Crisp • Dancy • holism • invariance • particularism. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBart Schultz (2007). Roger Crisp, Reasons and the Good:Reasons and the Good. Ethics 118 (1):143-146.
Anna Bergqvist (2010). Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14.
Erik Carlson (2003). Counterexamples to Principle Beta: A Response to Crisp and Warfield. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):730-737.
Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve (2011). Reply to Crisp. Utilitas 23:109-114.
Jonathan Dancy (2007). Defending the Right. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):85-98.
Roger Crisp (2006). Reasons and the Good. Clarendon Press.
Jonathan Dancy (2004). Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.
Jussi Suikkanen (2007). Reasons and the Good – Roger Crisp. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):503–505.
Roger Crisp (2007). Ethics Without Reasons? Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (1):40-49.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads25 ( #49,547 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,160 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
