Reply to Crisp

Utilitas 23:109-114 (2011)
Abstract In 'Why It Matters that Some Are Worse off than Others,' we offer a new critique of the Priority View. In a recent article, Roger Crisp has argued that our critique is flawed. In this reply Crisp, we show that Crisp fails to grapple with, much less defeat, the central claim of our critique. We also show that an example that Crisp offers in support of the Priority View in fact lends support to our critique of that view.
Keywords Prioritarianism  Egalitarianism  Distributive Ethics
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,875
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Campbell Brown (2005). Priority or Sufficiency …or Both? Economics and Philosophy 21 (2):199-220.
    Jussi Suikkanen (2007). Reasons and the Good – Roger Crisp. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):503–505.
    Larry S. Temkin (2003). Equality, Priority or What? Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):61-87.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-02-17

    Total downloads

    33 ( #37,235 of 556,888 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #39,122 of 556,888 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums