Argument against Ethicists' Testimony Logically Flawed

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (s4):4-5 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Behalf of Maverick Molinism.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2002 - Faith and Philosophy 19 (3):348-357.
On equivocation.Tom Stoneham - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (4):515-519.
Take it from me: The epistemological status of testimony.Catherinez Elgin - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):291-308.
Monitoring and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.Sanford Goldberg & David Henderson - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):600 - 617.
Take If from Me: The Epistemological Status of Testimony.Catherinez Elgin - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):291-308.
The reliability of testimony.Peter J. Graham - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (3):695-709.
The nature of testimony.Jennifer Lackey - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):177–197.
Expert Testimony by Ethicists: What Should be the Norm?Edward J. Imwinkelried - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):198-221.
Testimony: Evidence and Responsibility.Matthew Carl Weiner - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Testimony, knowledge, and epistemic goals.Steven L. Reynolds - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (2):139 - 161.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
16 (#929,841)

6 months
4 (#853,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The war on error.Giles R. Scofield - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):44 – 45.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references