David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):550-574 (2013)
According to proponents of relational direct realism, veridical perceptual experiences are irreducibly relational mental states that include as constituents perceived physical objects or intrinsic aspects of them. One consequence of the theory is the rejection of the causal theory of perception. This paper defends the relational theory against several objections recently developed by Paul Coates. He argues that the required experiential relation is incoherent and unmotivated. The argument that it is incoherent commits a fallacy. In reply to the argument that it is unmotivated, I suggest that the relational theorist's appeal to transparency provides sufficient motive and, when properly clarified, defeasibly justifies the theory as well. Coates also argues that rejection of the causal theory leaves relational theorists without any way of determining which object is perceived or of accommodating our scientific understanding of perceptual experiences as causally dependent on physical objects. I reply that relational theorists are able to provide the required explanations and discuss how the relational theory is consistent with this scientific understanding of perceptual experience
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
William Fish (2009). Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Oxford University Press.
Michael G. F. Martin (2002). The Transparency of Experience. Mind and Language 4 (4):376-425.
Michael G. F. Martin (2004). The Limits of Self-Awareness. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):37-89.
A. D. Smith (2002). The Problem of Perception. Harvard University Press.
Mark Johnston (2004). The Obscure Object of Hallucination. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):113-83.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joop Leo (2013). Relational Complexes. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):357-390.
James Genone (2014). Appearance and Illusion. Mind 123 (490):339-376.
Jonathan Cohen (2004). Color Properties and Color Ascriptions: A Relationalist Manifesto. Philosophical Review 113 (4):451-506.
Richard A. Fumerton (2000). Relational, Non-Relational, and Mixed Theories of Experience. In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center 21-28.
Josh Parsons (2009). Are There Irreducibly Relational Facts. In E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (eds.), Truth and Truth-Making. Acumen 217-226.
Kenneth J. Gergen (2009). Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community. Oxford University Press.
Margaret S. Archer (2010). Critical Realism and Relational Sociology: Complementarity and Synergy. Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2):199-207.
Sean Crawford (2003). Relational Properties, Causal Powers and Psychological Laws. Acta Analytica 18 (30-31):193-216.
Gail Fine (1981). Armstrong on Relational and Nonrelational Realism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (3):262-71.
Phillip John Meadows (2013). On A. D. Smith's Constancy Based Defence of Direct Realism. Philosophical Studies 163 (2):513-525.
M. D. Conduct (2008). Naïve Realism, Adverbialism and Perceptual Error. Acta Analytica 23 (2):147-159.
Caleb Liang (2008). Perceptual Phenomenology and Direct Realism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 42:103-148.
Susanna Schellenberg (2011). Perceptual Content Defended. Noûs 45 (4):714 - 750.
Added to index2011-03-23
Total downloads134 ( #28,219 of 1,907,896 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #48,378 of 1,907,896 )
How can I increase my downloads?