Responsibility, Luck, and Chance

Journal of Philosophy 96 (5):217-240 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consider the following principle: (LP) If an action is undetermined at a time t, then its happening rather than not happening at t would be a matter of chance or luck, and so it could not be a free and responsible action. This principle (which we may call the luck principle, or simply LP) is false, as I shall explain shortly. Yet it seems true.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Machinations of Luck.Nicholas Rescher - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (4-5):620-626.
Moral luck, control, and the bases of desert.David W. Concepcion - 2002 - Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4):455-461.
Choices Chance and Change: Luck Egalitarianism Over Time.Patrick Tomlin - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):393-407.
Kanian Freedom and the Problem of Luck.John Lemos - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):515-532.
Moral luck and computer ethics: Gauguin in cyberspace. [REVIEW]David Sanford Horner - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):299-312.
The Incompleteness of Luck Egalitarianism.Ryan Long - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:87-96.
Strokes of Luck.E. J. Coffman - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (4-5):477-508.
Indeterminism, explanation, and luck.Ishtiyaque Haji - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (3):211-235.
Libertarianism, luck, and control.Alfred R. Mele - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):381-407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
792 (#19,501)

6 months
52 (#85,807)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Kane
University of Texas at Austin

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references