Philosophical Studies 110 (2):163-96 (2002)
|Abstract||In this paper, I explore the question of whether the expected consequences of holding a belief can affect the rationality of doing so. Special attention is given to various ways in which one might attempt to exert some measure of control over what one believes and the normative status of the beliefs that result from the successful execution of such projects. I argue that the lessons which emerge from thinking about the case ofbelief have important implications for the way we should think about the rationality of a number of other propositional attitudes,such as regret, desire, and fear. Finally,I suggest that a lack of clarity with respect to the relevant issues has given rise to a number of rather serious philosophical mistakes.|
|Keywords||Belief Consequence Epistemology Normative Propositional Attitudes Rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tom Stoneham (1998). On Believing That I Am Thinking. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):125-44.
Franz Dietrich & Christian List, The Aggregation of Propositional Attitudes: Towards a General Theory.
Franz Dietrich Christian List, The Aggregation of Propositional Attitudes: Towards a General Theory.
John Zeimbekis (2004). Propositional Attitudes in Fiction. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):261-276.
Till Grüne-yanoff (2008). Action Explanations Are Not Inherently Normative. Theoria 74 (1):60-78.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2008). Against Essential Normativity of the Mental. Philosophical Studies 140 (2):263 - 283.
Nick Zangwill (2005). The Normativity of the Mental. Philosophical Explorations 8 (1):1-19.
Alan Millar (2004). Understanding People: Normativity and Rationalizing Explanation. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads84 ( #10,948 of 722,681 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,681 )
How can I increase my downloads?