What is Wrong with Strict Bayesianism?

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986 (1):450-457 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bayesian decision theory in its classical formulation supposes that for any rational agent and for any possible state x of the world, there is a number P(x). which represents the agent’s judgment of the probability of x. Similarly, the theory assumes that for any possible outcome y of the agent’s actions, there is a number u(y) which represents the utility or value of y to the agent. Given these assumptions, the theory is able to define the expected value for the agent of any act. Bayesian decision theory then recommends that the agent should choose, from amongst the available acts, one which has maximal expected utility.The assumption that an agent has a determinate personal probability function has often been attacked.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Wrong with Strict Bayesianism?Patrick Maher - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:450 - 457.
Introduction: Bayesianism into the 21st Century.Jon Williamson & David Corfield - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 1--16.
How to Be a Bayesian Dogmatist.Brian T. Miller - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):766-780.
Bayesian Scientific Methodology: A Naturalistic Approach.Yeongseo Yeo - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Maher, mendeleev and bayesianism.Colin Howson & Allan Franklin - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):574-585.
How Uncertain Do We Need to Be?Jon Williamson - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (6):1249-1271.
Bayesianism and Simplicity.Ben Escoto - 2004 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Ramsey and the measurement of belief.Richard Bradley - 2001 - In David Corfield & Jon Williamson (eds.), Foundations of Bayesianism.
Levi and the Defense of Bayesianism.Howard Hugh Harriott - 1988 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-30

Downloads
3 (#1,705,473)

6 months
2 (#1,194,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On indeterminate probabilities.Isaac Levi - 1974 - Journal of Philosophy 71 (13):391-418.
On Indeterminate Probabilities.Isaac Levi - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 71 (13):233--261.
Pragmatics and Empiricism.Brian Skyrms - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):514-516.
Reasoning and Explanatory Coherence.Gilbert Harman - 1980 - American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (2):151 - 157.

Add more references