David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 49 (2):231-236 (2010)
I argue that a metaphysical controversy, comparable with the ‘pantheism controversy’ of the late 18th century, is being played out today in the world-wide clash between religion and science, in which one side adheres to a strict materialism and the other admits phenomena of inspiritment as having a place in ontology. Just as the pantheism controversy was resolved, to some degree, via the concept of panentheism, so the solution to the contest between science and religion today might be pointing us in a panentheist direction. Taking into account (a) the empirical evidence of science, (b) the widespread evidence of spirit phenomena from different religions and spirit traditions, and (c) that the experience of spirit phenomena varies according to cultural frame of reference, I conclude that spirit phenomena must emanate from something that is common across cultures. The only thing that could be common across cultures is matter: it must be matter itself then that is imbued with spirit. While this position has affinities with panentheism, I argue that ‘panentheism’ is not in fact an appropriate name for it in the 21st century, as this name excludes the experience of many cultures for whom phenomena of inspiritment are not describable in any kind of theistic terms
|Keywords||Panentheism Pantheism controversy Science and religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kevin C. Elliott (2006). A Novel Account of Scientific Anomaly: Help for the Dispute Over Low-Dose Biochemical Effects. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):790-802.
Itay Shani (2007). The Myth of Reductive Extensionalism. Axiomathes 17 (2):155-183.
Massimo Pigliucci (2007). The Evolution-Creation Wars: Why Teaching More Science Just is Not Enough. McGill Journal of Education 42 (2):285-306.
Mark Collier (2005). Hume and Cognitive Science: The Current Status of the Controversy Over Abstract Ideas. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (2):197-207.
Amie L. Thomasson (2010). The Controversy Over the Existence of Ordinary Objects. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):591-601.
D. Z. Phillips & Mario Von der Ruhr (eds.) (2004). Language and Spirit. Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul Redding (2011). The Relevance of Hegel’s “Absolute Spirit” to Social Normativity. In Heikki Ikäheimo & Arto Laitinen (eds.), Recognition and Social Ontology. Brill. 212--238.
Ernest Sosa (1980). The Foundations of Foundationalism. Noûs 14 (4):547-564.
Teed Rockwell (2009). No Gaps, No God? Philosophy and Theology 21 (1/2):129-153.
Added to index2010-06-09
Total downloads49 ( #34,038 of 1,102,812 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,523 of 1,102,812 )
How can I increase my downloads?