Death, Brain Death, and the Limits of Science: Why the Whole-Brain Concept of Death Is a Flawed Public Policy

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):667-683 (2010)
Abstract Legally defining “death” in terms of brain death unacceptably obscures a value judgment that not all reasonable people would accept. This is disingenuous, and it results in serious moral flaws in the medical practices surrounding organ donation. Public policy that relies on the whole-brain concept of death is therefore morally flawed and in need of revision
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,865
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Winston Chiong (2005). Brain Death Without Definitions. Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
    Douglas N. Walton (1981). Epistemology of Brain Death Determination. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):259-274.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-09-30

    Total downloads

    45 ( #25,064 of 556,808 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #39,010 of 556,808 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums