David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Society 60 (1):7 - 26 (1996)
From its inception, the academic study of the history of science and technology has been contested terrain in the debate over whether science and capitalism are in fundamental conflict. Marxist writers such as Boris Hessen, Nikolai Bukharin, and J. D. Bernal raised these issues against the backdrop of the Great Depression of the 1930s, and writers such as Dirk Struik, Bernhard Stern and Henry Sigerist applied this work to American science. This combined body of work influenced Robert Merton's work "Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England". However, in the 1950s, questions about the social aspects of science were dropped in favor of a radical idealist approach to the history of science. The situation reversed in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when once again historians and sociologists rediscovered and extended the investigation of the politics and social relations of science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Edwin A. Roberts (2005). From the History of Science to the Science of History: Scientists and Historians in the Shaping of British Marxist Theory. Science and Society 69 (4):529 - 558.
Sue V. Rosser (1987). Feminist Scholarship in the Sciences: Where Are We Now and When Can We Expect A Theoretical Breakthrough? Hypatia 2 (3):5 - 17.
Gideon Freudenthal (2005). The Hessen-Grossman Thesis: An Attempt at Rehabilitation. Perspectives on Science 13 (2):166-193.
Boris Hessen, Henryk Grossmann, Gideon Freudenthal & Peter McLaughlin (eds.) (2009). The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Springer.
R. G. A. Dolby (1996). Uncertain Knowledge: An Image of Science for a Changing World. Cambridge University Press.
Gregory Blue (1998). Joseph Needham, Heterodox Marxism and the Social Background to Chinese Science. Science and Society 62 (2):195 - 217.
Ronald Edmund Doel & Thomas Söderqvist (eds.) (2006). The Historiography of Contemporary Science, Technology, and Medicine: Writing Recent Science. Routledge.
Bruno Latour (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard University Press.
Harold Dorn (2000). Science, Marx, and History: Are There Still Research Frontiers? Perspectives on Science 8 (3):223-254.
Laird Addis (1966). Freedom and the Marxist Philosophy of History. Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):101-.
A. Rupert Hall (1994). Science and Society: Historical Essays on the Relations of Science, Technology, and Medicine. Variorum.
Michael R. Matthews (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
Roger Ariew (1986). Descartes as Critic of Galileo's Scientific Methodology. Synthese 67 (1):77 - 90.
Massimo Pigliucci (2010). Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science From Bunk. University of Chicago Press.
Edgar Zilsel (2000). The Social Origins of Modern Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads3 ( #220,397 of 1,004,651 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?