Networked coordination: Effect of network structure human subjects' ability to solve coordination problem
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Scholars have investigated empirically how networks help or hinder a group's ability to solve real-world coordination problems. We add to the literature on coordination and networks by utilizing laboratory experiment to study the conditions under which groups of subjects can solve coordination games. We study a variety of different network structures that differ in their level of connectivity, and we also investigate coordination games with symmetric and asymmetric payoffs. Our results show that greater network connectivity helps to facilitate coordination both in symmetric and asymmetric games. Most significantly we find that network connectivity facilitates coordination even when payoffs are highly asymmetric. These results shed light on the conditions that may facilitate coordination in real-world networks.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Steve Alpern & Diane J. Reyniers (2002). Spatial Dispersion as a Dynamic Coordination Problem. Theory and Decision 53 (1):29-59.
Michele Bernasconi & Matteo Galizzi (2010). Network Formation in Repeated Interactions: Experimental Evidence on Dynamic Behaviour. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 9 (2):193-228.
Federica Alberti, Experimental Evidence of the Emergence of Aesthetic Rules in Pure Coordination Games.
Maarten C. W. Janssen (2003). Coordination and Cooperation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):165-166.
Giovanni Pezzulo (2011). Shared Representations as Coordination Tools for Interaction. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):303-333.
Hendrik Pieter Barendregt (2003). A Wide-Spectrum Coordination Model of Schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):84-85.
Daniel Hunter (1994). Act Utilitarianism and Dynamic Deliberation. Erkenntnis 41 (1):1 - 35.
Daniel C. Javitt (2003). Peeling the Onion: NMDA Dysfunction as a Unifying Model in Schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):93-94.
Peter Vanderschraaf & Diana Richards (1997). Joint Beliefs in Conflictual Coordination Games. Theory and Decision 42 (3):287-310.
Nicholas Almendares & Dimitri Landa (2007). Strategic Coordination and the Law. Law and Philosophy 26 (5):501-529.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #312,454 of 1,789,722 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,722 )
How can I increase my downloads?