Jesus and Hume among the Neuroscientists: Haidt, Greene, and the Unwitting Return of Moral Sense Theory

Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 36 (1):69-85 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The latest trend in ethics, sometimes dismissed as a fad, is the effort to connect ethics to empirical science. Two different versions of this “latest thing” can be found in the work of Jonathan Haidt and Joshua Greene. Their projects are, at least partly, unwitting recoveries of eighteenth-century Christian moral sense theory. Such similarities need not worry Christian ethicists but should instead inspire a careful retrieval of sentimentalism. It provides much of what today’s empirical ethicists hope to deliver without the pitfalls.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deontology defended.Nora Heinzelmann - 2018 - Synthese 195 (12):5197–5216.
Empirical Work in Moral Psychology.Joshua May - 2017 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Ethics and Intuitions.Peter Singer - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):331-352.
How to Be a Moral Taste Theorist.John McAteer - 2016 - Essays in Philosophy 17 (1):05-21.
Moral Sense Theory in the History of Rhetoric.Dorothy C. Broaddus - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Louisville
Naturalism and Ethics.Christian Miller - 2016 - In Kelly Clark (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. Blackwell. pp. 416-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-16

Downloads
10 (#1,194,003)

6 months
1 (#1,471,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Perry
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references