Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy Today 48 (1):35-49 (2004)
|Abstract||This essay examines some of Derrida’s most famous ‘possible-impossible’ aporias, including his discussions of giving, hospitality, forgiveness, and mourning. He argues that the condition of the possibility of such themes is also, and at once, the condition of their impossibility. In order to reveal the shared logic upon which these aporias rely, and also to raise some questions about their persuasive efficacy, it will be argued that of the two polarities evoked by each of his possible-impossible aporias, the ‘impossible’ term of the opposition invariably posits a separation between “two radical singularities”, or in somewhat more controversial terms, between a self and an other. While Derrida emphasises this ‘impossible’ aspect of giving, hospitality, forgiveness, etc., Merleau-Ponty’s abiding emphasis upon the chiasmic intertwining of self and other provides the resources to challenge this emphasis, and even to reverse it. While Merleau-Ponty rarely directly addresses the kind of aporias that concern Derrida, his chiasmic account of embodiment, and his emphasis upon the body-subject’s propensity to seek an equilibrium with its environment, better accounts for the ‘possible’ side of the aporias that Derrida describes. In the process, it will be argued that Merleau-Ponty’s later philosophy also allows for a more politically efficacious idea of responsibility towards the other than the position to which Derrida is tacitly committed.|
|Keywords||aporia self-other intersubjectivity Merleau-Ponty Derrida embodiment|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas Low (1992). Merleau-Ponty on Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity. International Studies in Philosophy 24 (3):45-64.
Glen Mazis (1997). Merleau-Ponty, Derrida, and Joyce's Ulysses: Is Derrida Really Bloom, Merleau-Ponty Dedalus, and Who Can Say 'Yes" to Molly? In M. C. Dillon (ed.), Ecart and Differance: Merleau-Ponty and Derrida on Seeing and Writing. Humanities.
Jack Reynolds (2002). Habituality and Undecidability: A Comparison of Merleau-Ponty and Derrida on the Decision. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (4):449 – 466.
Jack Reynolds (2008). Touched by Time: Some Critical Reflections on Derrida's Engagement with Merleau-Ponty in le Toucher. Sophia 47 (3):311-25.
Ann V. Murphy (2010). “All Things Considered:” Sensibility and Ethics in the Later Merleau-Ponty and Derrida. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):435-447.
Jack Reynolds (2002). Merleau-Ponty, Levinas, and the Alterity of the Other. Symposium 6 (1):63-78.
François Raffoul (2008). Derrida and the Ethics of the Im-Possible. Research in Phenomenology 38 (2):270-290.
Ronald Bruzina (2007). Merleau-Ponty and Derrida: Intertwining Embodiment and Alterity. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2):339-340.
David Morris (2008). Reversibility and Ereignis: On Being as Kantian Imagination in Merleau-Ponty and Heidegger. Philosophy Today 52:135-143.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-03-16
Total downloads1 ( #292,563 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?