Mitigation/Adaptation and Health: Health Policymaking in the Global Response to Climate Change and Implications for Other Upstream Determinants
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):629-639 (2010)
|Abstract||The time is ripe for innovation in global health governance if we are to achieve global health and development objectives in the face of formidable challenges. Integration of global health concerns into the law and governance of other, related disciplines should be given high priority. This article explores opportunities for health policymaking in the global response to climate change. Climate change and environmental degradation will affect weather disasters, food and water security, infectious disease patterns, and air pollution. Although scientific research has pointed to the interdependence of the global environment and human health, policymakers have been slow to integrate their approaches to environmental and health concerns. A robust response to climate change will require improved integration on two fronts: health concerns must be given higher priority in the response to climate change and threats associated with climate change and environmental degradation must be more adequately addressed by global health law and governance. The mitigation/adaptation response paradigm developing within and beyond the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change provides a useful framework for thinking about global health law and governance with respect to climate change, environmental degradation, and possibly other upstream determinants of health as well|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ruth Bell, Sebastian Taylor & Michael Marmot (2010). Global Health Governance: Commission on Social Determinants of Health and the Imperative for Change. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):470-485.
Jennifer Prah Ruger (2012). Global Health Justice and Governance. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
Duane Windsor (2009). Global Justice and Global Climate Change. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:23-34.
Amy Paul (2011). Growing Respect for Opposition. Hastings Center Report 41 (3):17-19.
Holly L. Wilson (2010). Divine Sovereignty and The Global Climate Change Debate. Essays in Philosophy 12 (1):8-15.
Paul Bellaby, Rob Flynn & Miriam Ricci (2011). Substituting 'H2 for C' and Reducing Global Inequalities in Health. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (1):91 - 103.
Dan C. Shahar (2009). Justice and Climate Change: Toward a Libertarian Analysis. The Independent Review 14 (2):219-237.
Chen Xia & Martin Schönfeld (2011). A Daoist Response to Climate Change. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (2):195 - 203.
Bruno Turnheim & Mehmet Y. Tezcan (2010). Complex Governance to Cope with Global Environmental Risk: An Assessment of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):517-533.
Alastair Neil Craik & Joseph F. DiMento, Climate Law and Policy in North America: Prospects for Regionalism.
Lawrence O. Gostin & Allyn L. Taylor (2008). Global Health Law: A Definition and Grand Challenges. Public Health Ethics 1 (1):53-63.
Cary Coglianese & Jocelyn D'Ambrosio, Policymaking Under Pressure: The Perils of Incremental Responses to Climate Change.
Dale Jamieson (2010). Climate Change, Responsibility, and Justice. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):431-445.
Mark A. Seabright (2011). The Role of the Affect Heuristic in Moral Reactions to Climate Change. Journal of Global Ethics 6 (1):5-15.
Jeremy Galbreath (2011). To What Extent is Business Responding to Climate Change? Evidence From a Global Wine Producer. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (3):421-432.
Added to index2010-09-30
Total downloads6 ( #154,584 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,265 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?