David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Res Publica 16 (4):351-366 (2010)
According to theories of wrongful life (WL), the imposition upon a child of an existence of poor quality can constitute an act of harming, and a violation of the child’s rights. The idea that there can be WLs may seem intuitively compelling. But, as this paper argues, liberals who commit themselves to WL theories may have to compromise some of their other beliefs. For they will thereby become committed to the claim that some women are under a stringent moral duty to have an abortion: a duty that could, without injustice, at least sometimes be enforced by the state. WL theories in other words imply that some women will lack a right to choose, under which both the decision to abort, and the decision to carry the fetus to term, are protected against interference. The paper exposes a dilemma, then, for liberals who are committed both to (a) the rights of future people not to be subjected to a harmful existence, and (b) the rights of women to refuse an abortion
|Keywords||Wrongful life Abortion Harm Rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
Allen E. Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler (2000). From Chance to Choice. Cambridge University Press.
David DeGrazia (2005). Human Identity and Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
John Harris (1998). Clones, Genes and Immortality: Ethics and the Genetic Revolution. Oxford University Press.
F. M. Kamm (1992). Creation and Abortion: A Study in Moral and Legal Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
F. M. Kamm (2002). Genes, Justice, and Obligations to Future People. Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2):360-388.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Robert Kaczor (2010). The Ethics of Abortion: Women's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice. Routledge.
Nancy S. Jecker (1987). The Ascription of Rights in Wrongful Life Suits. Law and Philosophy 6 (2):149 - 165.
E. M. Dadlez & William L. Andrews (2010). Post-Abortion Syndrome: Creating an Affliction. Bioethics 24 (9):445-452.
E. M. Dadlez & William L. Andrews (2010). Post‐Abortion Syndrome: Creating an Affliction. Bioethics 24 (9):445 - 452.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
Bertha Alvarez Manninen (2007). Pleading Men and Virtuous Women: Considering the Role of the Father in the Abortion Debate. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):1-24.
Evangelos Protopapadakis (2012). A Cool Hand on My Feverish Forehead: An Even Better Samaritan and the Ethics of Abortion. Philosophy Study 2 (2):115-123.
Simo Vehmas (2002). Parental Responsibility and the Morality of Selective Abortion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):463-484.
Jeremy Williams (2012). Sex-Selective Abortion: A Matter of Choice. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 31 (2):125-159.
Soran Reader (2008). Abortion, Killing, and Maternal Moral Authority. Hypatia 23 (1):132-149.
Andrea Whittaker (2004). Abortion, Sin, and the State in Thailand. Routledgecurzon.
Barry M. Loewer (1985). What is Wrong with 'Wrongful Life' Cases? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):127-146.
Patrick D. Hopkins (2008). Can Technology Fix the Abortion Problem? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):311-326.
Added to index2010-11-25
Total downloads32 ( #45,914 of 1,089,047 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,722 of 1,089,047 )
How can I increase my downloads?