1. John Hawthorne & Karson Kovakovich (2006). Disjunctivism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):145-83.
    [John Hawthorne] We examine some well-known disjunctivist projects in the philosophy of perception, mainly in a critical vein. Our discussion is divided into four parts. Following some introductory remarks, we examine in part two the link between object-dependent contents and disjunctivism. In part three, we explore the disjunctivist's use of discriminability facts as a basis for understanding experience. In part four, we examine an interesting argument for disjunctivism that has been offered by Michael Martin. /// [Scott Sturgeon] The paper aims (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  2. Tamar Szabó Gendler & Karson Kovakovich (2006). Genuine Rational Fictional Emotions. In Matthew Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Blackwell 241-253.
    The “paradox of fictional emotions” involves a trio of claims that are jointly inconsistent but individually plausible. Resolution of the paradox thus requires that we deny at least one of these plausible claims. The paradox has been formulated in various ways, but for the purposes of this chapter, we will focus on the following three claims, which we will refer to respectively as the Response Condition, the Belief Condition and the Coordination Condition.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3. John Hawthorne, Karson Kovakovich & Scott Sturgeon (2006). Disjunctivism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):185-216.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography