Order:
  1.  46
    Contradictions in Motion: Why They’re not Needed and Why They Wouldn’t Help.Emiliano Boccardi & Moisés Macías-Bustos - 2017 - Humana Mente 10 (32):195-227.
    In this paper we discuss Priest’s account of change and motion, contrasting it with its more orthodox rival, the Russellian account. The paper is divided in two parts. In first one we take a stance that is more sympathetic to the Russellian view, arguing that Priest’s arguments against it are inconclusive. In the second part, instead, we take a more sympathetic attitude towards Priest’s objections. We argue, however, that if these objections pose insurmountable difficulties to the Russellian account, then they (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  12
    Understanding Defective Theories.Moisés Macías-Bustos & María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz - 2023 - In Jonas R. B. Arenhart & Raoni W. Arroyo (eds.), Non-Reflexive Logics, Non-Individuals, and the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: Essays in Honour of the Philosophy of Décio Krause. Springer Verlag. pp. 101-127.
    Here, we deal with the question of under which circumstances can scientists achieve a legitimate understanding of defective theories qua defective. We claim that scientists understand a theory if they can recognize the theory’s underlying inference pattern(s) and if they can reconstruct and explain what is going on in specific cases of defective theories as well as consider what the theory would do if non-defective—even before finding ways of fixing it. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of this approach to understanding (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  21
    Understanding Defective Theories: The case of Quantum Mechanics and non-individuality.Moisés Macías-Bustos & María del Rosario Martínez-Ordaz - forthcoming - In Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart & Raoni Wohnrath Arroyo (eds.), Non-Reflexive Logics, Non-Individuals and the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: Essays in honor of the philosophy of D´ecio Krause.
    Here, we deal with the question of under which circumstances can scientists achieve a legitimate understanding of defective theories qua defective. We claim that scientists understand a theory if they can recognize the theory’s underlying inference pattern(s) and if they can reconstruct and explain what is going on in specific cases of defective theories as well as consider what the theory would do if non-defective –even before finding ways of fixing it. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of this approach to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark