Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. “Sleepwalking Into Infertility”: The Need for a Gentle Wake-Up Call.Judith C. Daniluk - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (11):52-54.
  • Does Money Make Bioethics Go 'Round?Raymond G. De Vries & Carla C. Keirns - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):65-67.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • ‘Tell Us What You Want to Do, and We'll Tell You How to Do It Ethically’—Academic Bioethics: Routinely Ideological and Occasionally Corrupt.Miran Epstein - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):63-65.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Legalisierung der aktiven Sterbehilfe – Förderung oder Beeinträchtigung der individuellen Autonomie?Does the legalisation of active euthanasia strengthen or impair individual autonomy?Frank Dietrich - 2009 - Ethik in der Medizin 21 (4):275-288.
    Theorists who support the legalisation of active euthanasia usually base their arguments on the principle of autonomy. In their view the wish of a severely ill person not to continue his or her life must be respected. However, some opponents of the legalisation of active euthanasia refer to the principle of autonomy as well. They are concerned that patients may be held responsible for burdening others with the provision of care. Thus family members, physicians or nurses may exert pressure on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Choosing Between Life and Death: Patient and Family Perceptions of the Decision Not to Resuscitate the Terminally Ill Cancer Patient.Jaklin Eliott & Ian Olver - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (3):179–189.
  • Legalisierung der aktiven Sterbehilfe – Förderung oder Beeinträchtigung der individuellen Autonomie?Pd Dr Frank Dietrich - 2009 - Ethik in der Medizin 21 (4):275-288.
    Für die Argumentation von Moralphilosophen, die die Legalisierung der aktiven Sterbehilfe befürworten, spielt das Autonomieprinzip eine wichtige Rolle. Ihrer Auffassung nach verlangt der Respekt vor der Autonomie, die Entscheidung eines schwer kranken Menschen gegen die Fortsetzung des Lebens vorbehaltlos anzuerkennen. Dagegen haben verschiedene Theoretiker auf Gefahren hingewiesen, die die rechtliche Zulassung der Tötung auf Verlangen für die individuelle Autonomie mit sich bringt. Sobald der Kranke über die Möglichkeit der aktiven Sterbehilfe verfüge, falle ihm die Verantwortung für die Inanspruchnahme von Pflegeleistungen (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Limits of Reproductive Freedom: Advanced Maternal Age and Harm to the Unborn Child.Miran Epstein & Ariel Zosmer - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (11):51-52.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Deciding on Death: Conventions and Contestations in the Context of Disability. [REVIEW]Margrit Shildrick - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (2-3):209-219.
    Conflicts between bioethicists and disability theorists often arise over the permissibility of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Where mainstream bioethicists propose universalist guidelines that will direct action across a range of effectively disembodied situations, and take for granted that moral agency requires autonomy, feminist bioethicists demand a contextualisation of the circumstances under which moral decision making is conducted, and stress a more relational view of autonomy that does not require strict standards of independent agency. Nonetheless, neither traditional nor feminist perspectives (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations