Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e20-e20 (2008)

Background: Only data of published study results are available to the scientific community for further use such as informing future research and synthesis of available evidence. If study results are reported selectively, reporting bias and distortion of summarised estimates of effect or harm of treatments can occur. The publication and citation of results of clinical research conducted in Germany was studied.Methods: The protocols of clinical research projects submitted to the research ethics committee of the University of Freiburg in 2000 were analysed. Published full articles in several databases were searched and investigators contacted. Data on study and publication characteristics were extracted from protocols and corresponding publications.Results: 299 study protocols were included. The most frequent study design was randomised controlled trial , followed by uncontrolled studies , laboratory studies and non-randomised studies . 182 were multicentre studies including 97 international collaborations. 152 of 299 had commercial funding and 46 non-commercial funding. 109 of the 225 completed protocols corresponded to at least one full publication ; the publication rate was 48%. 168 of 210 identified publications were cited in articles indexed in the ISI Web of Science. The median was 11 citations per publication .Conclusions: Results of German clinical research projects conducted are largely underreported. Barriers to successful publication need to be identified and appropriate measures taken. Close monitoring of projects until publication and adequate support provided to investigators may help remedy the prevailing underreporting of research
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2008.024521
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mehr Nutzen als Schaden?More good than harm?Angelika Hüppe & Heiner Raspe - 2011 - Ethik in der Medizin 23 (2):107-121.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Conflict of Interest and Medical Publication.Marcus M. Reidenberg - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):455-457.
Statistics and Ethics in Medical Research.David L. DeMets - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):97-117.


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #245,855 of 2,504,849 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #81,690 of 2,504,849 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes