Argumentation and distortion

Episteme 4 (3):382-401 (2007)
Why is there so much misrepresentation of arguments in public forums? Standard explanations, such as self-interested biases, are insufficient. An additional part of the explanation is our commitment to, or belief in, norms that disallow responses that amount to no firm judgment, as contrasted with definite agreement or disagreement. In disallowing no-firm-judgment responses, these norms deny not only degrees of support or dissent and a variety of ways of suspending judgment, but also indifference. Since these norms leave us with only constricted options that are very intellectually demanding, in accepting these norms we impose on ourselves a pressure to justify our judgment that lends itself to relief through misrepresentation or distortion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3366/E1742360007000159
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,553
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Belief's Own Ethics.J. Adler - 2002 - MIT Press.
Change in View.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - MIT Press.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1700 - Oxford University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

96 ( #53,221 of 2,168,327 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #43,292 of 2,168,327 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums