Authors
Michael James Bennett
University of King's College
Abstract
This paper reconstructs Gilles Deleuze’s interpretation of Epicurean atomism, and explicates his claim that it represents a problematic idea, similar to the idea exemplified in early, “barbaric” accounts of the differential calculus. Deleuzian problematic ideas are characterized by a mechanism through whose activity the components of the idea become determinate in relating reciprocally to one another, rather than in being determined exclusively in relation to an extrinsic paradigm or framework. In Epicurean atomism, as Deleuze reads it, such a mechanism of determination can be found in the famous atomic “swerve”. It is necessary to bear this interpretation of Epicurean atomism in mind when understanding Deleuze and Guattari’s promulgation of a new image of thought in What is Philosophy? , which has an explicitly Epicurean inspiration. The paper argues that this inspiration is particularly evident to the extent that Deleuze and Guattari identify the sub-representative feature that lies at the heart of their new image of thought with “chaos”, defined as “infinite speed”. I claim that infinite speed, this otherwise puzzling feature of What is Philosophy? , ought to be understood in the light of Deleuze’s interpretation of Epicurus. Moreover, the Epicurean distinctions between different speeds must be read together with Deleuze’s appropriation of the metaphysics of the ancient Stoics, who, although widely recognized as Deleuze’s Hellenistic counterparts, lack important theoretical resources that the Epicureans provide for Deleuze
Keywords infinity  atomism  swerve  Epicurus  Gilles Deleuze  speed
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5195/jffp.2013.599
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Did Epicurus Discover the Free-Will Problem?Susanne Bobzien - 2000 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 19:287-337.
Physics.Daniel W. Aristotle & Graham - 1999 - Hackett Publishing Company.
Epicurus on the Truth of the Senses.Stephen Everson - 1990 - In Epistemology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 161-183.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Responsive Becoming: Ethics Between Deleuze and Feminism.Erinn Gilson - 2011 - In Nathan Jun & Daniel W. Smith (eds.), Deleuze and Ethics. Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze on Cinema.Ronald Bogue - 2003 - Routledge.
The Cambridge Companion to Deleuze.Daniel W. Smith & Henry Somers-Hall (eds.) - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Deleuze, Marx and the Politicisation of Philosophy.Simon Choat - 2009 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 3 (Suppl):8-27.
Deleuze, Guattari, and Contemporary Art.Stephen Zepke - 2009 - In Eugene W. Holland, Daniel W. Smith & Charles J. Stivale (eds.), Gilles Deleuze: Image and Text. Continuum.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-12

Total views
17 ( #604,438 of 61,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #432,124 of 61,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes