What can cognitive science tell us about scientific revolutions?


Authors
Alexander James Bird
King's College London
Abstract
Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions is notable for the readiness with which it drew on the results of cognitive psychology. These naturalistic elements were not well received and Kuhn did not subsequently develop them in his pub- lished work. Nonetheless, in a philosophical climate more receptive to naturalism, we are able to give a more positive evaluation of Kuhn’s proposals. Recently, philosophers such as Nersessian, Nickles, Andersen, Barker, and Chen have used the results of work on case-based reasoning, analogical thinking, dynamic frames, and the like to illuminate and develop various aspects of Kuhn’s thought in Structure. In particular this work aims to give depth to the Kuhnian concepts of a paradigm and incommensurability. I review this work and identify two broad strands of research. One emphasizes work on concepts; the other focusses on cognitive habits. After contrasting these, I argue that the conceptual strand fails to be a complete account of scientific revolutions. We need a broad approach that draws on a variety of resources in psychology and cognitive science.
Keywords scientific revolutions  cognitive science  Kuhn  incommensurability
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0495-4548  
DOI 10.5840/theoria201227324
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,283
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Similarity-Based Approach Of Kuhn’s No-Overlap Principle And Anomalies.Dragoş Bîgu - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (3):330-338.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kuhn’s Wrong Turning.Alexander Bird - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):443-463.
Thomas Kuhn.Thomas Nickles (ed.) - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
The Influence of James B. Conant on Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions.K. Brad Wray - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):1-23.
Thomas Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2000 - Routledge.
Thomas Kuhn's Cottage.Alex Levine - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (3):369-377.
Naturalizing Kuhn.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):99-117.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-04

Total views
189 ( #39,554 of 2,271,240 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #71,623 of 2,271,240 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature