Informed Consent in Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Outline of A Model between Specific and Generic Consent
Bioethics 27 (3):343-351 (2013)
Broad genome-wide testing is increasingly finding its way to the public through the online direct-to-consumer marketing of so-called personal genome tests. Personal genome tests estimate genetic susceptibilities to multiple diseases and other phenotypic traits simultaneously. Providers commonly make use of Terms of Service agreements rather than informed consent procedures. However, to protect consumers from the potential physical, psychological and social harms associated with personal genome testing and to promote autonomous decision-making with regard to the testing offer, we argue that current practices of information provision are insufficient and that there is a place – and a need – for informed consent in personal genome testing, also when it is offered commercially. The increasing quantity, complexity and diversity of most testing offers, however, pose challenges for information provision and informed consent. Both specific and generic models for informed consent fail to meet its moral aims when applied to personal genome testing. Consumers should be enabled to know the limitations, risks and implications of personal genome testing and should be given control over the genetic information they do or do not wish to obtain. We present the outline of a new model for informed consent which can meet both the norm of providing sufficient information and the norm of providing understandable information. The model can be used for personal genome testing, but will also be applicable to other, future forms of broad genetic testing or screening in commercial and clinical settings
|Keywords||direct‐to‐consumer generic consent specific consent personal genome testing informed consent genetic testing autonomy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Direct-to-Consumer Genomics on the Scales of Autonomy.E. Vayena - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):310-314.
Similar books and articles
Informed Consent and Genetic Information.O. O'Neill - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):689-704.
Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice.Deborah Bowman - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.
On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent.Jukka Varelius - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
The Ethical Challenges of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
Informed Consent: Hospitals Must Obtain Informed Consent Prior to Drug Testing Pregnant Patients.Katherine Gehringer - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 31 (3):455-457.
The $1000 Genome: Ethical and Legal Issues in Whole Genome Sequencing of Individuals. [REVIEW]John A. Robertson - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):35-42.
Prescribing Placebos Ethically: The Appeal of Negatively Informed Consent.David Shaw - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):97-99.
Challenges in the Use of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing in Children.Holly Tabor & Maureen Kelley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):32-34.
Consent and Informational Responsibility.Shaun D. Pattinson - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
Added to index2012-11-10
Total downloads22 ( #222,958 of 2,153,479 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,080 of 2,153,479 )
How can I increase my downloads?