- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Personal utility is inherent to direct-to-consumer genomic testing
Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (10):649-652 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):322-326.
The Dangers of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease: Comment on “Personal Genomic Testing, Genetic Inheritance, and Uncertainty”.Paul Lacaze, Jane Tiller & Joanne Ryan - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (4):585-587.
Direct to Consumer Personal Genomic Testing and Trust : A Comparative Focus Group Study of Lay Perspectives in Germany, Israel, the Netherlands and the UK.Aviad Raz Manuel Schaper, Karim Raza Marie Falahee, Elisa Garcia Gonzalez Danielle Timmermans & Sabine Wöhlke Silke Schicktanz - 2021 - In Ulrik Kihlbom, Mats G. Hansson & Silke Schicktanz (eds.), Ethical, social and psychological impacts of genomic risk communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
The sense of proportion: two thoughts about the governance of direct-to-consumer genetic testing for children.Peter Mills - 2010 - Genomics, Society and Policy 6 (3):1-3.
Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test.Michele Loi - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (9):574-577.
Chung Wai Wen Hua Hua Tsai Kuo Chi Kuan Hsi Che Hsüeh Shang Ti I T Ung.Tzu-hsün Lin & Chung-Hua Wen Hua Fu Hsing Yün Tung T. Ui Hsing Wei Yüan Hui - 1982 - Chung Yang Wen Wu Kung Ying She.
Challenges in the Use of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing in Children.Holly K. Tabor & Maureen Kelley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):32-34.
Direct-to-Consumer Genomics Companies Should Provide Guidance to Their Customers on (Not) Sharing Personal Genomic Information.Nanibaa’ A. Garrison & Amy L. Non - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):55-57.
Regulatory and medical aspects of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.M. Sharkey Catherine, Michael Xiaohan Wu & Kenneth Offit F. Walsh - 2021 - In I. Glenn Cohen, Nita A. Farahany, Henry T. Greely & Carmel Shachar (eds.), Consumer genetic technologies: ethical and legal considerations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
A principled approach to cross‐sector genomic data access.Marcus Smith & Seumas Miller - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (8):779-786.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-03
Downloads
36 (#457,344)
6 months
5 (#711,375)
2016-06-03
Downloads
36 (#457,344)
6 months
5 (#711,375)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Genes wide open: Data sharing and the social gradient of genomic privacy.Tobias Haeusermann, Marta Fadda, Alessandro Blasimme, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras & Effy Vayena - forthcoming - AJOB Empirical Bioethics:1-15.
On the personal utility of Alzheimer’s disease-related biomarker testing in the research context.Eline M. Bunnik, Edo Richard, Richard Milne & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (12):830-834.
“I would rather have it done by a doctor”—laypeople’s perceptions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and its ethical implications.Manuel Schaper, Sabine Wöhlke & Silke Schicktanz - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (1):31-40.
Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test.Wendy Elizabeth Bonython & Bruce Baer Arnold - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (11):787-789.
Moral motivation regarding dementia risk testing among affected persons in Germany and Israel.Zümrüt Alpinar-Sencan, Silke Schicktanz, Natalie Ulitsa, Daphna Shefet & Perla Werner - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (11):861-867.
References found in this work
Direct-to-consumer genomics on the scales of autonomy.Effy Vayena - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):310-314.
Integrity, the self, and desire-based accounts of the good.Robert Noggle - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 96 (3):301-328.
Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):322-326.
Revealing the results of whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing in research and clinical investigations: some ethical issues: Table 1.Nina Hallowell, Alison Hall, Corinna Alberg & Ron Zimmern - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):317-321.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-hhxx8 uwo