Incidental Findings in Genetics Research Using Archived DNA

Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):286-291 (2008)
Despite calls by some commentators for disclosing incidental fndings in genetics research, several factors weigh in favor of caution. The technology of genetics has the power to uncover a vast array of information. The most potent argument for restraint in disclosure is that much research is pursued without consent so that the individual participant may not know that research is being conducted at all. Often the work is done by investigators and at institutions with which the person has no prior contact. Past practice is also relevant; genetics researchers historically have chosen not to disclose incidental fndings, of which misattributed paternity and pleiotropic alleles such as ApoE have been the most common. Many people choose not to have genetic tests when given a choice. It may be desirable to discuss the topic of incidental fndings when consent for research is obtained, but given the risk of unwanted surprise when there has been no prior discussion, the potential utility of incidental fndings should be very high before they are even ofered to individuals
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00271.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,836
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Disclosing Misattributed Paternity.Lainie Friedman Ross - 1996 - Bioethics 10 (2):114–130.
The Question Not Asked: The Challenge of Pleiotropic Genetic Tests.Robert Samuel Wachbroit - 1998 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (2):131-144.
DNA Banking and Informed Consent: Part 1.Robert F. Weir & Jay R. Horton - forthcoming - IRB: Ethics & Human Research.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Understanding Incidental Findings in the Context of Genetics and Genomics.Mildred K. Cho - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):280-285.
Early Responses to Avery Et Al.'S Paper on DNA as Hereditary Material.U. Deichmann - 2004 - Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 34 (2):207-232.
Genomic Research and Incidental Findings.Brian van Ness - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):292-297.
Research Malpractice and the Issue of Incidental Findings.Alan C. Milstein - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):356-360.
Incidental Findings in Pediatric Research.Benjamin S. Wilfond & Katherine J. Carpenter - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):332-340.
Incidental Findings in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Brain Research.Charles A. Nelson - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):315-319.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
8 ( #552,748 of 2,231,650 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #446,025 of 2,231,650 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature