Dual-use decision making: relational and positional issues

Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):268-283 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Debates about dual-use research often turn on the potential for scientific research to be used to benefit or harm humanity. This dual-use potential is conventionally understood as the product of the magnitude of the harms and benefits of dual-use research, multiplied by their likelihood. This account, however, neglects important social aspects of the use of science and technology. In this paper, I supplement existing conceptions of dual-use potential to account for the social context of dual-use research. This account incorporates relational and positional concerns that feature in the success or failure of dual-use. I then defend this account against foreseeable objections.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-30

Downloads
43 (#380,907)

6 months
16 (#171,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Evans
Australian National University

References found in this work

On Human Nature.Edward O. Wilson - 1978 - Harvard University Press.
Science, truth, and democracy.Philip Kitcher - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Moral Judgement of the Child.Jean Piaget - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (31):373-374.
The division of cognitive labor.Philip Kitcher - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5-22.

View all 68 references / Add more references