Abstract
Dual-process and dual-system theories in both cognitive and social psychology have been subjected to a number of recently published criticisms. However, they have been attacked as a category, incorrectly assuming there is a generic version that applies to all. We identify and respond to 5 main lines of argument made by such critics. We agree that some of these arguments have force against some of the theories in the literature but believe them to be overstated. We argue that the dual-processing distinction is supported by much recent evidence in cognitive science. Our preferred theoretical approach is one in which rapid autonomous processes are assumed to yield default responses unless intervened on by distinctive higher order reasoning processes. What defines the difference is that Type 2 processing supports hypothetical thinking and load heavily on working memory
Keywords dual processes  dual systems  Individual differences  Rationality  rationality  Working memory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1745691612460685
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Inferential Transitions.Jake Quilty-Dunn & Eric Mandelbaum - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):532-547.

View all 265 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Dual-Process and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning.Keith Frankish - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (10):914-926.
The Magical Number Two, Plus or Minus: Dual Process Theory as a Theory of Cognitive Kinds.Richard Samuels - 2009 - In Keith Frankish & Jonathan St B. T. Evans (eds.), In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press. pp. 129--146.
Balance in Psychological Research: The Dual Process Perspective.Keith E. Stanovich - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):357-358.
Fleshing Out a Dual-System Solution.James Friedrich - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):671-672.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-05-26

Total views
137 ( #77,427 of 2,448,682 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #58,047 of 2,448,682 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes