HEC Forum 25 (4):325-344 (2013)

Authors
Jessica Flanigan
University of Richmond
Abstract
I argue that young patients should be able to access neuroenhancing drugs without a diagnosis of ADHD. The current framework of consent for pediatric patients can be adapted to accommodate neuroenhancement. After a brief overview of pediatric neuroenhancement, I develop three arguments in favor of greater acceptance of neuroenhancement for young patients. First, ADHD is not relevantly different from other disadvantages that could be treated with stimulant medication. Second, establishing a legitimate framework for pediatric neuroenhancement would mitigate the bad effects of diversion and improve research on neuroenhancement and ADHD. Third, some pediatric patients have rights to access neuroenhancements. I then consider several objections to pediatric neuroenhancement. I address concerns about addiction, advertising, authentic development, the parent–child relationship and equal opportunity and conclude that these concerns may inform a framework for prescribing neuroenhancement but they do not justify limits on prescribing
Keywords Pediatric consent  Neuroenhancement  Informed consent  Social justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10730-013-9222-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,514
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Is There a Problem with Enhancement?Frances M. Kamm - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):5 – 14.
Deflating the Neuroenhancement Bubble.Jayne C. Lucke, Stephanie Bell, Brad Partridge & Wayne D. Hall - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):38-43.
Three Arguments Against Prescription Requirements.Jessica Flanigan - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):579-586.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Neuroenhancement: Much Ado About Nothing?Frédéric Gilbert & Bernard Baertschi - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):45-47.
Informed Consent in Pediatric Research.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):346-358.
Cognitive Development and Pediatric Consent to Organ Donation.Susan Zinner - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):125-132.
Toward a Coherent Account of Pediatric Decision Making.A. S. Iltis - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-08-21

Total views
76 ( #124,890 of 2,348,275 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #120,293 of 2,348,275 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes