Thisness and vagueness

Synthese 54 (2):235-259 (1983)
This paper is about two puzzles, or two versions of a single puzzle, which deserve to be called paradoxes, and develops some apparatus in terms of which the apparently conflicting principles which generate the puzzles can be rendered consistent. However, the apparatus itself is somewhat controversial: the puzzles are modal ones, and the resolution to be advocated requires the adoption of a counterpart theoretic semantics of essentially the kind proposed by David Lewis, which in turn requires qualified rejection of certain modal theses about identity which are valid in S5
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00869393
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,479
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Theodore Sider (1996). All the World's a Stage. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (3):433 – 453.
Graeme Forbes (1986). In Defense of Absolute Essentialism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):3-31.
Graeme Forbes (1984). Two Solutions to Chisholm's Paradox. Philosophical Studies 46 (2):171 - 187.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

77 ( #63,252 of 1,925,592 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

24 ( #20,028 of 1,925,592 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.