Critical remarks on Religion in the public sphere' – Habermas between Kant and Kierkegaard

Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):27-47 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article provides a critical assessment of Habermas’s recent work on religion and its role in the public sphere by comparing it to Kant’s phi-losophy of religion on the one hand and that of Kierkegaard on the other. It is argued that although Habermas is in many ways a Kantian, he diverges from Kant when it comes to religion, by taking a position which comes closer to the Kierkegaardian view that religiousness belongs to private faith rather than philosophy. This has implications not just for the conception of religion but also for the very roles of communication, validity, rationality, and philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-12

Downloads
494 (#42,244)

6 months
163 (#26,352)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2009.Margit Ruffing - 2011 - Kant Studien 102 (4):499-540.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Future of Human Nature.Jürgen Habermas - 2003 - Cambridge, UK: Polity. Edited by Jürgen Habermas.
The Future of Human Nature.Jürgen Habermas - 2003 - Cambridge, UK: Polity. Edited by Jürgen Habermas.
The Future of Human Nature.Jurgen Habermas - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (309):483-486.
Religion in the public sphere.Jürgen Habermas - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):1–25.
Kant's moral religion.Allen W. Wood - 1970 - Ithaca,: Cornell University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references