A reinstatement, in response to Gillies, of Redhead's argument in support of induction

Philosophy of Science 54 (3):470-472 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/289395

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A response to Jackson.F. John Clendinnen - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):444-448.
In defense of the Popper-Miller argument.Donald Gillies - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.
‘Good Sense’ in context: A response to Kidd.Milena Ivanova - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):610-612.
Truth and provability: A comment on Redhead.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):611-613.
A New Group Dutch Book Argument.Matthew Kopec - 2017 - Ratio 30 (2):122-136.
Scientific Realism and Primitive Ontology Or: The Pessimistic Induction and the Nature of the Wave Function.Valia Allori - 2018 - Lato Sensu 1 (5):69-76.
What did Hume really show about induction?Samir Okasha - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):307-327.
Reply to a response.Frank Jackson - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):449-451.
The justification(s) of induction(s).Philip Ellery Catton - unknown
Methodological Objectivism and Critical Rationalist ’Induction’.Alfred Schramm - 2006 - In Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford & David Miller (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Volume Ii. Ashgate.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
23 (#705,674)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support.Ellery Eells & Branden Fitelson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (2):129 - 142.
Bayes' theorem.James Joyce - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaconfirmation.Denis Zwirn & Herv� P. Zwirn - 1996 - Theory and Decision 41 (3):195-228.
Partly deductive support in the Popper-Miller argument.Burke Townsend - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):490-496.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

In defense of the Popper-Miller argument.Donald Gillies - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.
Corroboration, explanation, evolving probability, simplicity and a sharpened razor.I. J. Good - 1968 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 19 (2):123-143.
On the impossibility of inductive probability.Michael Redhead - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (2):185-191.

Add more references