Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):543-559 (2004)
The transfer of food among group members is a ubiquitous feature of small-scale forager and forager-agricultural populations. The uniqueness of pervasive sharing among humans, especially among unrelated individuals, has led researchers to evaluate numerous hypotheses about the adaptive functions and patterns of sharing in different ecologies. This article attempts to organize available cross-cultural evidence pertaining to several contentious evolutionary models: kin selection, reciprocal altruism, tolerated scrounging, and costly signaling. Debates about the relevance of these models focus primarily on the extent to which individuals exert control over the distribution of foods they acquire, and the extent to which donors receive food or other fitness-enhancing benefits in return for shares given away. Each model can explain some of the variance in sharing patterns within groups, and so generalizations that ignore or deny the importance of any one model may be misleading. Careful multivariate analyses and cross-cultural comparisons of food transfer patterns are therefore necessary tools for assessing aspects of the sexual division of labor, human life history evolution, and the evolution of the family. This article also introduces a framework for better understanding variation in sharing behavior across small-scale traditional societies. I discuss the importance of resource ecology and the degree of coordination in acquisition activities as a key feature that influences sharing behavior. Key Words: behavioral ecology; cooperation; costly signaling; food sharing; foragers; reciprocal altruism.
|Keywords||behavioral ecology cooperation costly signaling food sharing foragers reciprocal altruism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Culture–Gene Coevolution, Norm-Psychology and the Emergence of Human Prosociality.Maciej Chudek & Joseph Henrich - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (5):218-226.
A Paleolithic Reciprocation Crisis: Symbols, Signals, and Norms.Kim Sterelny - 2014 - Biological Theory 9 (1):65-77.
Has Punishment Played a Role in the Evolution of Cooperation? A Critical Review.Nicolas Baumard - 2010 - Mind and Society 9 (2):171-192.
Similar books and articles
The Purpose of Exchange Helps Shape the Mode of Exchange.Raymond Hames - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):564-565.
The History of Human Food Transfers: Tinbergen's Other Question.Jim Moore - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):566-567.
Tolerated Reciprocity, Reciprocal Scrounging, and Unrelated Kin: MaKing Sense of Multiple Models.Michael Gurven - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):572-579.
Key Variables in Tests of Food Sharing.Margaret Franzen - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):563-563.
Tolerated Scrounging in Nonhuman Primates.Gillian R. Brown - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):562-563.
Nonmarket Cooperation in the Indigenous Food Economy of Taimyr, Arctic Russia: Evidence for Control and Benefit.John Ziker - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):571-571.
Cognitive Constraints on Reciprocity and Tolerated Scrounging.Jeffrey R. Stevens & Fiery A. Cushman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):569-570.
Insights From Ifaluk: Food Sharing Among Cooperative Fishers.Richard Sosis - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):568-569.
The Details of Food-Sharing Interactions – Their Cost in Social Prestige.Amotz Zahavi - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):570-571.
A Kind Man Benefits Himself – but How? Evolutionary Models of Human Food Sharing.Thomas Getty - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):563-564.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #165,534 of 2,169,136 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #186,290 of 2,169,136 )
How can I increase my downloads?