Does epistemic proceduralism justify the disenfranchisement of children?

Journal of Global Ethics 15 (3):287-305 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most laypersons and political theorists endorse the claims that all adults should be enfranchised and all children should be disenfranchised. The first claim rejects epistocracy; the second...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights.Steven Lecce - 2009 - Intergenerational Justice Review 4 (4).
Pure Epistemic Proceduralism.Fabienne Peter - 2008 - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 5 (1):33-55.
Penal Disenfranchisement.Christopher Bennett - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):411-425.
The Limits of Criminal Disenfranchisement.Nicholas Munn - 2011 - Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (3):223-239.
The disenfranchisement of felons.L. R. - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (6):553-580.
Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Truth promoting non-evidential reasons for belief.Brian Talbot - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):599-618.
Children and developed agency.Andrew Divers - 2013 - Childhood and Philosophy 9 (18):225-244.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-07

Downloads
46 (#343,893)

6 months
9 (#300,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Is child disenfranchisement justified?Nico Brando - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (5):635-657.

Add more citations